2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-criteria approach for comparison of environmental assessment methods in the analysis of the energy efficiency in agricultural production systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As research deepens, scholars have incorporated unexpected outputs (environmental pollution accompanying economic growth) into the evaluation index system of industrial ecological efficiency [10], including greenhouse gas emissions [11], industrial solid waste, and industrial wastewater [12]. The measurement methods include life cycles, ecological footprint, emergy analysis, intuitionistic fuzzy, random frontier, and data envelopment analysis (DEA) methods [13]. The DEA method has been widely used, and evaluates the efficiency of multi-objective decision-making units with multiple inputs and outputs, including three-stage DEA [14] and super-efficiency slack-based modeling (SBM) [15].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As research deepens, scholars have incorporated unexpected outputs (environmental pollution accompanying economic growth) into the evaluation index system of industrial ecological efficiency [10], including greenhouse gas emissions [11], industrial solid waste, and industrial wastewater [12]. The measurement methods include life cycles, ecological footprint, emergy analysis, intuitionistic fuzzy, random frontier, and data envelopment analysis (DEA) methods [13]. The DEA method has been widely used, and evaluates the efficiency of multi-objective decision-making units with multiple inputs and outputs, including three-stage DEA [14] and super-efficiency slack-based modeling (SBM) [15].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should tap into the potential for industrial energy conservation and carbon reduction in the western region. The average ranking of industrial ecological efficiency in Central China in the last ten years is: Hunan (7), Henan (13), Hubei (14), Jiangxi (17), Shanxi (19), Heilongjiang (24), Jilin (25), and Anhui (27). Therefore, Hunan Province should be exemplary in industrial transformation and development.…”
Section: Improving Industrial Ecological Efficiency In Central Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the proposed conceptual framework, we propose the following concept: "energy efficiency is the foundation of equity and sustainability where the ecological limitations of natural systems and the demands on environmental services of society are valued, taking into account decisions, the opportunity, and the energy requirements for an end, channeling most of the available energy into the production of goods and/or services and avoiding the degradation of energy into possible pollutants and waste" [38]. Similarly, it is necessary to consider that the systems are structured hierarchically [39].…”
Section: A Basis For An Alternative Vision Of Ee In Colombiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effect of energy consumption on the ecological environment is becoming increasingly serious [ 18 ]. Rodriguez et al [ 19 ] investigated six environmental evaluation models and found that the ecological model was the most suitable approach for an agricultural environmental assessment, because it helped assess the environmental impact of agricultural energy consumption. Activities related to agricultural energy consumption, such as crop planting, livestock breeding and aquatic product fishing [ 20 , 21 ], all emit carbon dioxide and thus agricultural energy consumption is also positively correlated with carbon dioxide emissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%