2020
DOI: 10.1111/jfbc.13570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation study on the interaction between cyanidin 3 ‐O ‐glucoside and major proteins in cow's milk

Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the molecular interaction and complex stability of four major cow's milk (CM) proteins (α-LA, β-LG, α s1-CA, and β-CA) with cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G) using computational methods. The results of molecular docking analysis revealed that hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interaction were the main binding forces to maintain the stability of the C3G-CM protein complexes. Molecular dynamics simulation results showed that all complexes except for C3Gα s1-CA were found to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(75 reference statements)
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the systems were simulated by MD for 50 ns. Unless special explanation, all other parameters are consistent with the methods of our previous study ( Pan et al, 2021 ). The GROMACS package (version 19.5) was used to analyze the MD trajectories.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the systems were simulated by MD for 50 ns. Unless special explanation, all other parameters are consistent with the methods of our previous study ( Pan et al, 2021 ). The GROMACS package (version 19.5) was used to analyze the MD trajectories.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…MD simulations were carried out according to our previous methods with slight modifications ( Pan et al, 2021 ). In brief, MD simulations were performed for 50 ns using the GROMACS 19.5 package ( https://manual.gromacs.org/ ) with Amber ff99SB-ILDN force field and TIP3P explicit water model for DPP-IV with or without peptides.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the lumen of the protein can provide a strong hydrophobic environment and multiple hydrogen binding sites for the ligand, which contributes to the stability of the ligand [49] . In order to further understand the binding between forsythoside A and various receptors, the interactions between them were analyzed, including hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the differences of the affinity and hydrogen, hydrophobic bonds stability between the ligand and the receptor, the stability of the complexes is different, resulting in the different breakdown degrees of the complexes under different thermal conditions. For examples, the affinity values of the glutenin–gallic acid complex and gliadin–gallic acid complex were −6.5 kcal/mol and −5.6 kcal/mol, respectively, indicating that gliadin–gallic acid complex breakdown easier than glutenin–gallic acid when they were given the same energy (Pan et al., 2020). Besides, the stability of the hydrogen bond was determined by the bond length (Å), bond energy (ΔE) (Cooper, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%