2017
DOI: 10.1520/gtj20160242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mogi-Type True Triaxial Testing Apparatus for Rocks With Two Moveable Frames in Horizontal Layout for Providing Orthogonal Loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have already used the same cores to study the influence of the intermediate principal stress (σ 2 ) on the permeability evolution during true triaxial compression [41]. Although this paper emphasizes the effect of confining pressure (P c ) on the strain-permeability behavior of mudstone, which can be tested by a conventional triaxial apparatus with a cylindrical specimen, the true triaxial apparatus for rocks [41][42][43][44][45] at the Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, which can exert three stresses independently, was still employed in this study because the specimen usually failed with a relatively flat fault parallel to σ 2 [42,[46][47][48]; the flow in the σ 2 direction can still be regarded as a one-dimensional flow. In contrast, the fault of the specimen in the CTC is not only very rough but also oblique to the flow direction [40,49] and the fluid flow inside the specimen near or after failure cannot be approximated as a one-dimensional flow; therefore, the cores in this study were also processed into cuboid specimens of 5 cm square by 10 cm long ( Figure 1) and the permeability in the σ 2 direction was monitored during deviatoric loading.…”
Section: Specimen Apparatus and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have already used the same cores to study the influence of the intermediate principal stress (σ 2 ) on the permeability evolution during true triaxial compression [41]. Although this paper emphasizes the effect of confining pressure (P c ) on the strain-permeability behavior of mudstone, which can be tested by a conventional triaxial apparatus with a cylindrical specimen, the true triaxial apparatus for rocks [41][42][43][44][45] at the Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, which can exert three stresses independently, was still employed in this study because the specimen usually failed with a relatively flat fault parallel to σ 2 [42,[46][47][48]; the flow in the σ 2 direction can still be regarded as a one-dimensional flow. In contrast, the fault of the specimen in the CTC is not only very rough but also oblique to the flow direction [40,49] and the fluid flow inside the specimen near or after failure cannot be approximated as a one-dimensional flow; therefore, the cores in this study were also processed into cuboid specimens of 5 cm square by 10 cm long ( Figure 1) and the permeability in the σ 2 direction was monitored during deviatoric loading.…”
Section: Specimen Apparatus and Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6(b) shows that the natural logarithm of the differential pressure P associated with the first measurement decreases linearly over time. The stability and accuracy of the other subsystems of the TTA for the loading of the three principal stresses were also demonstrated by Shi et al 31 Specimens P4 and P15 were compressed at a low value of σ 2 (i.e., σ 2 σ 3 ), which means that they were compressed under conventional triaxial stress conditions. A comparison of the results shown in Figs 7 and 8(a) illustrates that the confining pressure has a significant impact on the change in permeability of the specimen under compression.…”
Section: Repeatability Testsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Figure (b) shows that the natural logarithm of the differential pressure Δ P associated with the first measurement decreases linearly over time. The stability and accuracy of the other subsystems of the TTA for the loading of the three principal stresses were also demonstrated by Shi et al …”
Section: Specimens and Test Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations