2018
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2018.1529150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A modified two-stage randomized response model for estimating the proportion of stigmatized attribute

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where k is the total number of cards in the deck R 2 . Solving equation (1) for π, an estimator for π is given as follows:…”
Section: When the Proportion Of Unrelated Innocuous Attribute Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where k is the total number of cards in the deck R 2 . Solving equation (1) for π, an estimator for π is given as follows:…”
Section: When the Proportion Of Unrelated Innocuous Attribute Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If asked directly, a respondent may be reluctant to admit and respond with a "no" perhaps, embarrassed to reveal their true behavior in fear of social stigma or negative judgments. Under such circumstances, researchers end up dealing with fabricated or distorted responses, thus leading to inaccurate or invalid estimates of the sensitive behaviors they are studying [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Greenberg et al [2] extended the Warner's idea for mean estimation of quantitative sensitive variables. Some other developments for the estimation of mean are due to Eichhorn and Hayre [3]; Bar-Lev et al [4]; Gupta et al [5]; Gupta et al [6] Hussain et al [7]; Singh et al [8]; Singh and Suman [9]; Lee and Hong [10]; Narjis and Shabbir [11,12]; and Muneer et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In optional RRT model, respondents are requested to provide the truthful response if he or she considers the question to be nonsensitive and use the randomization device if he or she considers the question sensitive and provide the response after using randomization device. Some developments to estimate the proportion of sensitive attribute are due to Greenberg et al (1969); Chaudhuri and Mukerjee (1988); Mangat and Singh (1990); Mahmood, Singh, and Horn (1998); Perri (2008); G. N. Singh and Suman (2019); Mazloum (2015, 2016); Batool, Shabbir, and Hussain (2017); H. P. Singh and Tarray (2016); H. P. Singh and Gorey (2017); Tarray and Singh (2018); Shabbir (2018, 2019); and Hussain, Cheema, and Hussain (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%