2000
DOI: 10.1029/2000wr900224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Modeling and experimental study of light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) accumulation in wells and LNAPL recovery from wells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gudbjerg et al (2004) and Schmidt et al (2002) used the T2VOC code (Falta et al, 1995) to simulate steam injection. Hydraulic removal of NAPLs was numerically modeled by Waddill and Parker (1997) with the ARMOS code (Environmental Systems and Technologies, 1996) and by Sleep et al (2000) The reasons why the majority of the flow cell experiments was not subject to numerical analysis were probably associated with funding, scientific interest, code or modeler availability, and the complexity of the enhanced remediation technique. Unfortunately, even when numerical models become available in the future, it will be impossible for modelers to go back and use the data of several previous experiments because they do not provide the necessary basic information on fluid properties, hydraulic properties, and initial or boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussion and Research Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Gudbjerg et al (2004) and Schmidt et al (2002) used the T2VOC code (Falta et al, 1995) to simulate steam injection. Hydraulic removal of NAPLs was numerically modeled by Waddill and Parker (1997) with the ARMOS code (Environmental Systems and Technologies, 1996) and by Sleep et al (2000) The reasons why the majority of the flow cell experiments was not subject to numerical analysis were probably associated with funding, scientific interest, code or modeler availability, and the complexity of the enhanced remediation technique. Unfortunately, even when numerical models become available in the future, it will be impossible for modelers to go back and use the data of several previous experiments because they do not provide the necessary basic information on fluid properties, hydraulic properties, and initial or boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussion and Research Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System design is often based on simplified equations for fluid movement (e.g., Charbeneau et al, 2000) based on nonhysteretic fluid distributions (e.g., Lenhard and Parker, 1990). The experiments by Waddill and Parker (1997) and Sleep et al (2000) have demonstrated the need to include pore geometry and fluid entrapment hysteresis into numerical models for and accurate simulation of the observed phenomena. Several research topics related to hydraulic NAPL recovery are of interest.…”
Section: Discussion and Research Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The numerical model used for this purpose in this study is COMPSIM, a three‐dimensional, multicomponent, finite differences model that simulates multiphase flow and advective‐dispersive transport in groundwater [ Sleep and Sykes , ]. COMPSIM has been used in the literature to simulate groundwater contamination and remediation of organic compounds [ McClure and Sleep , ; Sleep et al ., ; O' Carroll and Sleep , , ]. To simulate DNAPL infiltration, COMPSIM allows the use of infiltration models of varying complexity, from simple Brooks‐Corey to the complex hysteretic constitutive relationships of Gerhard and Kueper [].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%