2009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Cardiovascular Disease Giving a Plausible Mechanism for the Effect of Fractionated Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation Exposure

Abstract: Atherosclerosis is the main cause of coronary heart disease and stroke, the two major causes of death in developed society. There is emerging evidence of excess risk of cardiovascular disease at low radiation doses in various occupationally exposed groups receiving small daily radiation doses. Assuming that they are causal, the mechanisms for effects of chronic fractionated radiation exposures on cardiovascular disease are unclear. We outline a spatial reaction-diffusion model for atherosclerosis and perform s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The somewhat high (albeit nonsignificant) risks for hypertensive heart disease and CeVD if RBM dose is used (Table 6) (weakly) suggest that dose to this tissue may not be relevant for these endpoints. There is biological data suggesting radiation-associated senescence of monocytes [39], and a some-what similar mechanism based on monocyte cell killing in the arterial intima suggests that the arterial intima may be causally associated with initiating atheroma in the arterial wall [40] (although there are many other stages between that point and plaque rupture [41,42]), so that mean arterial dose might be the most relevant organ or tissue dose for studying circulatory disease. Several recent reviews [8,9,28,43] describe the abundant radiobiological reasons for considering the studies of moderate and low doses separately from studies of high doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The somewhat high (albeit nonsignificant) risks for hypertensive heart disease and CeVD if RBM dose is used (Table 6) (weakly) suggest that dose to this tissue may not be relevant for these endpoints. There is biological data suggesting radiation-associated senescence of monocytes [39], and a some-what similar mechanism based on monocyte cell killing in the arterial intima suggests that the arterial intima may be causally associated with initiating atheroma in the arterial wall [40] (although there are many other stages between that point and plaque rupture [41,42]), so that mean arterial dose might be the most relevant organ or tissue dose for studying circulatory disease. Several recent reviews [8,9,28,43] describe the abundant radiobiological reasons for considering the studies of moderate and low doses separately from studies of high doses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…138 An examination of possible biological mechanisms indicates that the most likely target of radiation-induced cardiovascular damages are endothelial cells and subsequent induction of an inflammatory response. 144 Again, inflammation and, in general, non-targeted effects mediated by the microenvironment are the major pathways in radiation response of the organisms, 122 driving both cancer and non-cancer late effects, as well as for radiation therapy. 145 Generally speaking, the epidemiological evidence of non-cancer late effects in exposed individuals is consistent with radiationinduced acceleration of the ageing process.…”
Section: Late Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensing the presence of the oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) in the intima, endothelial cells begin to secrete monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 (Harrington 2000;Reape and Groot 1999), which attracts monocytes into the intima (Osterud and Bjorklid 2003). After entering the intima, monocytes differentiate into macrophages, which endocytose the ox-LDL (Gui et al 2012;Johnson and Newby 2009;Little et al 2009). The ingestion of large amounts of ox-LDL transforms the fatty macrophages into foam cells (Calvez et al 2009;Gui et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%