2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, in keeping with Krajnc and Glavič (2005), we will differentiate between indicators whose increase has a positive impact on sustainable development and those whose increase has a negative impact, where I þ N ;ijt ;, the normalized indicator i (with positive impact) for a group of indicators j for time (year) t and I À N ;ijt ; the normalized indicator i (with negative impact) for a group of indicators j for the same time ( Table V shows as an example the core indicators, both original and normalized used in the case of Germany. The defined membership functions for the core indicators, performance indicators, the ICSDI and the ESAI are triangular membership functions not only due to their simplicity (Lin et al, 2007) but also because they can approximate most non-triangular ones (Pedrycz, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, in keeping with Krajnc and Glavič (2005), we will differentiate between indicators whose increase has a positive impact on sustainable development and those whose increase has a negative impact, where I þ N ;ijt ;, the normalized indicator i (with positive impact) for a group of indicators j for time (year) t and I À N ;ijt ; the normalized indicator i (with negative impact) for a group of indicators j for the same time ( Table V shows as an example the core indicators, both original and normalized used in the case of Germany. The defined membership functions for the core indicators, performance indicators, the ICSDI and the ESAI are triangular membership functions not only due to their simplicity (Lin et al, 2007) but also because they can approximate most non-triangular ones (Pedrycz, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Notwithstanding, the literature concerned with the evaluation of public and private sustainable development initiatives coincides in the necessity of creating indicators that would quantify the concept and realize the abovementioned evaluation process (see Andriantiatsaholiniaina et al, 2004;Azapagic, 2004;Atlee and Kirchain, 2006;European Commission, 2005;Hanley et al, 1999;Krajnc and Glavič, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The using of composite index can be seen in the cognition of development trends in business decision making. In the qualitative part of the research we have created in the condition of particular enterprise a composite index of sustainability which we constructed based on the work of Glavič & Krajnc (2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these results, a criteria weight distribution was developed in consultation with a team of interdisciplinary scientists and project partners. where CSI is the composite sustainability indicator, w is the weight of criterion i, and cv is the criteria value of criterion i (compare Krajnc and Glavič 2005).…”
Section: Criteria For Sustainable Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%