2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0956792512000186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for dynamic communicators

Abstract: We develop and test an intuitively simple dynamic network model to describe the type of time-varying connectivity structure present in many technological settings. The model assumes that nodes have an inherent hirerarchy governing the emergence of new connections. This idea draws on newly established concepts in on-line human behavior concerning the existence of discussion catalysts, who initiate long threads, and on-line leaders, who trigger feedback. We show that the model captures an important property foun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Huffaker [23, p. 594] identifies online leaders who 'trigger feedback, spark conversations within the community, or even shape the way that other members of a group "talk" about a topic'. Related experiments in Mantzaris & Higham [24] on e-mail and voice mail data led to the term dynamic communicators to describe individuals with an enhanced ability to disseminate or collect information relative to their centrality based on static or aggregate summaries. Our aim here is to present a framework that allows us to quantify these effects elegantly and efficiently in a continuous-time setting.…”
Section: Background On Network Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Huffaker [23, p. 594] identifies online leaders who 'trigger feedback, spark conversations within the community, or even shape the way that other members of a group "talk" about a topic'. Related experiments in Mantzaris & Higham [24] on e-mail and voice mail data led to the term dynamic communicators to describe individuals with an enhanced ability to disseminate or collect information relative to their centrality based on static or aggregate summaries. Our aim here is to present a framework that allows us to quantify these effects elegantly and efficiently in a continuous-time setting.…”
Section: Background On Network Centralitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, broadcast and receive centralities are related by a reversal of the time ordering. Synthetic examples in [12] and [23] illustrate that broadcast centrality (BC) and receive centrality (RC) measures perform better than aggregated measures in identifying nodes with time-sensitive links as important. The term dynamic communicator coined in [23] refers precisely to the nodes which rank highly in the dynamic sense but do not stand out in a snapshot or aggregate view of the network.…”
Section: Dynamic Communicabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are motivated by examples in [23] and [40] which show that centrality measures based on time-aggregated versions of temporal networks (as shown in Fig. 2) fail to adequately capture important nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative walk-counting approach in [5] was based on a direct generalization of Katz centrality [6] to the case of time-dependent networks. A key message from [13] and [8] is that centrality measures based on a static, aggregate summary of the network will not adequately reflect the hierarchy of importance.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%