A Model for a Chikungunya Outbreak in a Rural Cambodian Setting: Implications for Disease Control in Uninfected Areas

Abstract

Following almost 30 years of relative silence, chikungunya fever reemerged in Kenya in 2004. It subsequently spread to the islands of the Indian Ocean, reaching Southeast Asia in 2006. The virus was first detected in Cambodia in 2011 and a large outbreak occurred in the village of Trapeang Roka Kampong Speu Province in March 2012, in which 44% of the villagers had a recent infection biologically confirmed. The epidemic curve was constructed from the number of biologically-confirmed CHIKV cases per day determined from the date of fever onset, which was self-reported during a data collection campaign conducted in the village after the outbreak. All individuals participating in the campaign had infections confirmed by laboratory analysis, allowing for the identification of asymptomatic cases and those with an unreported date of fever onset. We develop a stochastic model explicitly including such cases, all of whom do not appear on the epidemic curve. We estimate the basic reproduction number of the outbreak to be 6.46 (95% C.I. [6.24, 6.78]). We show that this estimate is particularly sensitive to changes in the biting rate and mosquito longevity. Our model also indicates that the infection was more widespread within the population on the reported epidemic start date. We show that the exclusion of asymptomatic cases and cases with undocumented onset dates can lead to an underestimation of the reproduction number which, in turn, could negatively impact control strategies implemented by public health authorities. We highlight the need for properly documenting newly emerging pathogens in immunologically naive populations and the importance of identifying the route of disease introduction.

The hidden burden of Chikungunya in central Mexico: results of a small-scale serosurvey

“…This is consistent with the range of 5 to 40% of asymptomatic CHKV infections previously described by other authors. [22][23][24] Although chikungunya, dengue, and zika are similar diseases that can be misclassified on clinical grounds, the severity of symptoms facilitates recognition of chikungunya and, therefore, the proportion of unapparent infections is typically lower than that in dengue (61% to 74%) or zika (80%). [25][26][27] Almost two fifths of the seropositive participants (39.5%) in our survey reported persistent pain, limited mobility, or lasting arthralgia.…”

Imported chikungunya cases in an area newly colonised by Aedes albopictus: mathematical assessment of the best public health strategy

“…Other modelling studies have focused on chikungunya virus transmission in other epidemiological settings [20,23,24], some with a focus on VC [25]. Some studies have highlighted that certain areas are more suitable than others for chikungunya epidemics [26].…”

Estimating dengue type reproduction numbers for two provinces of Sri Lanka during the period 2013–14

“…We estimated k 1 from the dengue data from 2 provinces and during estimation, we bound this parameter within the range (0, 10). 28,21 Similar to the aquatic population, following, 6,5 initial adult mosquito abundance taken to be dependent on the total human population at the beginning i.…”

“…28 In Table 2, we summarize the demographic known and unknown parameters of the dengue model (2.1, 2.2, and 2.3).…”

“…Dynamical models are fundamentally important, since the biological processes driving dengue transmission are embedded within a dynamically changing environment on a range of timescales. 43,26,23,28 All of these studies considered the dynamical interaction between human and mosquito in the presence of one dengue virus strain. However, dengue endemic areas, generally more than one strain co-circulate to cause infection.…”