2009
DOI: 10.1243/13506501jet659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed lubrication model incorporating measured surface topography. Part 2: Roughness treatment, model validation, and simulation

Abstract: Abstract:A mixed lubrication flow factor model that permits real three-dimensional surface topography as input has been developed. Part 1 gives the theory of computing flow factors within the model. In this article, a method of adapting the measured surface topography signal to suit the numerical models is developed and presented in detail. The mixed lubrication model is validated through flow measurements for three different rough surface test specimens. Simulation of a hydrodynamic bearing was conducted and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al applied fast Fourier transform to calculate the elastic-plastic contact pressures as well as sub-surface stresses [11]. A way to implement ideal plastic behaviour was presented by Sahlin et al [32]. Given a force F a , the model presented by Sahlin et al can be used to calculate the average separation h between two measured surface topographies.…”
Section: Mixed Lubrication Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al applied fast Fourier transform to calculate the elastic-plastic contact pressures as well as sub-surface stresses [11]. A way to implement ideal plastic behaviour was presented by Sahlin et al [32]. Given a force F a , the model presented by Sahlin et al can be used to calculate the average separation h between two measured surface topographies.…”
Section: Mixed Lubrication Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model, unlike the more common approach by Greenwood and Tripp [29], numerically deforms a real, measured, surface topography to give the average asperity contact pressure as a function of separation. The technique is described in detail by Sahlin et al [30,31] and will not be repeated here. The piston ring, R a = 0.066µm, is rather smooth compared to the liner surfaces and is therefore assumed to perfectly smooth during the numerical simulations.…”
Section: Calculation Of Flow Factors and Asperity Contact Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the surfaces come into contact the deformation is found using a boussinesq-type elasto-plastic contact mechanics model. The whole technique is described in detail by Sahlin et al [29,30] and will not be repeated here.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the velocity is known a force balance is solved where the film thickness is calculated which balances the applied load with the hydrodynamically supported load and the load supported by asperity contact (from the contact mechanics model [29,30]). …”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%