2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed-integer linear programming model for the continuous casting planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reasonable scheduling plan can effectively reduce production cost and energy consumption, promote quality and efficiency and reduce the emission of carbon and other pollutants. Bellabdaoui and Teghem identify a mixed integer linear programming model to find the solution to the continuous casting problem [1]. However, the optimization algorithm cannot arrive at the optimal solution to scheduling in steelmaking casting production in a timely manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reasonable scheduling plan can effectively reduce production cost and energy consumption, promote quality and efficiency and reduce the emission of carbon and other pollutants. Bellabdaoui and Teghem identify a mixed integer linear programming model to find the solution to the continuous casting problem [1]. However, the optimization algorithm cannot arrive at the optimal solution to scheduling in steelmaking casting production in a timely manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still not very satisfactory when solving the large-scale SCC problems in actual iron & steel companies. The most commonly used methods for solving the SCC scheduling problems are and mixed-integer linear optimization (MILP) [3][4][5], artificial intelligence, linear optimization (LP), heuristics [6,7] and simulation methods. The literatures [8][9][10] illustrate the detailed reviews on these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But these two algorithms have some weakness. For example, GA has lower local searching ability, not enough uses the feedback information in system, and prone to "premature" convergence in practical application [9]. While for PSO, it has lower searching precision, prone to fall into local optimal, the global optimal solution may not easy to be searched as the result [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%