2013
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.751514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A MILP model for the Accessibility Windows Assembly Line Balancing Problem (AWALBP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This environment, where task positioning limits the access to restricted areas of the workpiece, motivates the so-called accessibility windows assembly line balancing problem (AWALBP) (Calleja et al, 2013). A well-known classification of assembly line balancing problems is the one proposed by Baybars (1986), which differentiates between two classic problems: the Simple Assembly Line Balancing Problem (SALBP) and the General Assembly Line Balancing Problem (GALBP).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2). This environment, where task positioning limits the access to restricted areas of the workpiece, motivates the so-called accessibility windows assembly line balancing problem (AWALBP) (Calleja et al, 2013). A well-known classification of assembly line balancing problems is the one proposed by Baybars (1986), which differentiates between two classic problems: the Simple Assembly Line Balancing Problem (SALBP) and the General Assembly Line Balancing Problem (GALBP).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization of AWALBP involves the solution of several NP-hard subproblems (Gaudlitz, 2004). With regard to the subproblems considered, the AWALBP can be tackled at four optimization levels (Calleja et al, 2013): the assignment of each task to one compatible workstation and stationary stage (AWALBP-L1); the initial position of the workpieces in the cycle, as well as the number and the length of the forward steps (AWALBP-L2); the component type allocation to feeders (AWALBP-L3); and the number and the type of workstations (AWALBP-L4). The objective is to minimize the cycle time.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations