2015
DOI: 10.1039/c4cc09999k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microporous metal–organic framework with rare lvt topology for highly selective C2H2/C2H4separation at room temperature

Abstract: . (2015). A microporous metal-organic framework with rare lvt topology for highly selective C2H2/C2H4 separation at room temperature. Chemical Communications, 51(26), 5610-5613.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
30
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SBU commonly observed for Cu or Zn based MOFs 44 . The resulting 3D structure adopts a rarely reported 4-c lvt topology 45 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…SBU commonly observed for Cu or Zn based MOFs 44 . The resulting 3D structure adopts a rarely reported 4-c lvt topology 45 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The emerging microporous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) [10][11][12][13] based on physicala dsorption are promising as cost-effective ande fficient materials for gas separation, which has been at opic of interest because the ability to rationally designa nd chemically tune their architecture of the MOFs allowsc hemists to establish variousm ethodst oa chieve highly selectivegas adsorption. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Since the pioneered work of Kitagawa and co-workers, [14] some MOFsw ith high acetylene storage have been realized by using immobilizedo pen metal sites (OMS). [30,31] For C 2 H 2 /C 2 H 4 separation,a fter the first work realized by using the flexible MOFs on the basis of metalloligandsi n 2011, [2] the series of MOF-74 [3] with high densitieso fo pen metal sites and NOTT-300 [4] with multiple weak supramolecular interactions were also employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Compared with other porous adsorbents, such as activated carbons and molecular sieves, MOFs have greater potential both at a research and application level by virtue of their attractive advantages. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] On the one hand, the high porosity of MOFs allows them to take up large amounts of gas molecules; on the other hand, the easilyadjustable pore/window sizes and functionalization within MOFs offer signicant improvements in gas separation selectivity. [36][37][38][39][40] In terms of gas separation, the pores within MOFs can be judiciously modied through the immobilization of specic sites like Lewis basic sites (LBSs) and functional groups including amino groups to enhance the interaction between the framework and preferred gas molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%