“…The aforementioned formulations lack in one, or more, of the following ways: (i) they may not be analytical models, instead they rely on computational (finite elements [17] or finite difference [7]) methods that may not offer direct insights into the asymptotic (limiting) effects of geometric and material variables for general solenoids, and their computational nature often implies that conclusions may be confined to the specific solenoid configurations being simulated. Additionally, the simulations are dependent on finite computational resources (memory and processor) and may often experience non-convergence for solenoids of increasing complexity, due to the disparately scaled and quasi-static nature of the problem [7], (ii) they may be two-dimensional approximations of the three-dimensional solenoid and may not include all three orthogonal field components [7], [18], (iii) some analytical models may rely on approximations that are valid only for certain configurations (e.g., infinitely long solenoids [16] and tightly wound windings with an infinitesimal wire pitch [16], [19], circularly symmetric loops [13], certain core material [18], etc. ), or they may be valid only in certain regions (e.g., only inside [18] or only outside the solenoid volume, only along the solenoid's axes, or only in the far-field, etc).…”