2018
DOI: 10.1080/19401493.2018.1457722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A methodology for auto-calibrating urban building energy models using surrogate modeling techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this method was based on the calibration of each building, which requires more than 1,000 simulations to train the meta-models for each building. Nagpal et al (Nagpal et al, 2019) employed statistical surrogate models with an optimization algorithm to estimate properties of unknown building parameters. Up to 28 unknown parameters with three values each were selected.…”
Section: Question 7: How Can Results From Ubem Be Calibrated?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method was based on the calibration of each building, which requires more than 1,000 simulations to train the meta-models for each building. Nagpal et al (Nagpal et al, 2019) employed statistical surrogate models with an optimization algorithm to estimate properties of unknown building parameters. Up to 28 unknown parameters with three values each were selected.…”
Section: Question 7: How Can Results From Ubem Be Calibrated?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full combination of the parameters leads to a massive number of simulations. In the previous UBEM calibration studies, 100 samples [24], 200 to 400 samples [22], and 1000 samples [23] were generated for each building. So, the is the end use result of the reference building for the sample, which is stored in the energy performance database., the end-use results are guessed and aggregated to generate the annual electricity and natural gas EUIs using equation (1).…”
Section: Calibrate the Ubemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is equally important to address the issues of availability and quality of input data (Mangold et al, 2015;Monteiro et al, 2018;Nouvel et al, 2017), and methods to compensate for its deficiencies, e.g. probabilistic building parameter estimation (Burke et al, 2017;Nagpal et al, 2018) or data enrichment (Neun, 2007;Remmen et al, 2016;Schiefelbein et al, 2019). This goes hand in hand with development of approaches for managing the uncertainty embedded in the models and calibration of the models obtained in order to ensure good quality of the modelling outcomes (Sokol et al, 2017).…”
Section: Urban Building Energy Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of the proposed UBEM is the intensive utilisation of high-resolution metered data on actual energy use. This avoids use of more complex approaches to building energy simulations, including automatic generation of individual building geometry-based 'shoebox' models (Dogan and Reinhart, 2017) and their further calibration (Nagpal et al, 2018). Hence, the UBEM employs a much smaller number of simulations, as they are created for virtual archetype buildings only, making it computationally lighter than its geometry-based analogues.…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation