2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2018.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of the direct measurement of the true stress–strain curve over a large strain range using multi-camera digital image correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the former method, a pair of strain gauges (SKF-27085, 200 μm gauge length; Kyowa) was immobilized to the proximal tibia in an orthogonal direction, and the tibia was compressed with 1 N, 2 N, or 5 N loads at 2 Hz. In the latter method, we employed the previously described procedure, 46 and the strain was calculated from the dynamic pattern of displacements on the tibial surface.…”
Section: Strain Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former method, a pair of strain gauges (SKF-27085, 200 μm gauge length; Kyowa) was immobilized to the proximal tibia in an orthogonal direction, and the tibia was compressed with 1 N, 2 N, or 5 N loads at 2 Hz. In the latter method, we employed the previously described procedure, 46 and the strain was calculated from the dynamic pattern of displacements on the tibial surface.…”
Section: Strain Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material strain softening takes place during metal forming of ductile materials at room temperature due to the accumulation of damage [3,4,45,50] with plastic deformation or increased strain. About four decades ago, Gurson [51] studied the role of hydrostatic pressure in plastic deformation with emphasis on void nucleation and growth for porous ductile materials using the upper bound approach, revealing that plastic dilatation depends on porosity and that porosity can be nucleated during straining at second phases in a ductile matrix or at grain boundary misfits.…”
Section: Description Of Strain Softening Using the Second Strain Hardening Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our experiences say that maximum strain at the last sample point ranges from 1.0 [10] to 1.5 for SCM435 [28] or SUS304 [44], and a sort of extrapolation is thus inevitable especially for automatic multi-stage cold forging where effective strain may exceed 4.0 at locally deformation-concentrated region. Very recently, Li et al [45] employed a special multi-camera DIC system to directly determine the true stress-strain curve over a large strain range from the tensile test of sheet specimen, revealing that there exists a distinct softening start point. It is noted that one strong point of material characterization using the tensile test is the possibility of revealing the mechanism of damage accumulation and fracture in the region of localized necking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photogrammetry is a relatively robust technique, but this method has limited accuracy and is difficult to meet the requirements of resolution [11,12]; Optical measurement includes digital holographic (DH), digital laser speckle correlation (DSCM), conventional DSPI, etc. [13,14,15,16]. Among these measurement methods, DH has been heralded as a new era of whole-field deformation analyses in a microscopic level [16,17,18], however, DH is susceptible to changes in the external environment, such as vibration, and air disturbance [19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%