2019
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2018.2866154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Weak Target Detection Based on Human Visual Contrast Mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of each single frame image is 480 × 640. To further show the robustness and effectiveness of the LCME approach, we implement seven state‐of‐the‐art infrared small target detection methods for comparison, which are the NLCM [18], RLCM [19], NSM [24], CF [25], TDGS [26], GSS‐ELCM [28], and MF [29]. All the parameters of the compared algorithms are specially set for each tested infrared image so that they show the best performance under the complex background of the test image.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of each single frame image is 480 × 640. To further show the robustness and effectiveness of the LCME approach, we implement seven state‐of‐the‐art infrared small target detection methods for comparison, which are the NLCM [18], RLCM [19], NSM [24], CF [25], TDGS [26], GSS‐ELCM [28], and MF [29]. All the parameters of the compared algorithms are specially set for each tested infrared image so that they show the best performance under the complex background of the test image.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target detection performance is quantified by the commonly used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve generated from the detection rate (DR) and false alarm rate (FAR) [ 47 ] quantities calculated as: where defines the true detections, defines the actual total targets, defines the number of false positive detections (incorrectly segmented pixels) and N denotes the number of total pixels in the input image. Detections within a radius of five pixels of the ground truth’s center were considered correct.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a fast target detection method guided by visual saliency (TDGS) [28] extracts visual salient regions by combining small space-scale, high-frequency, high local contrast and isolation distribution, thereby rapidly and accurately detecting dim and small targets. In the case of unknown prior information, the neighborhood saliency map (NSM) [29] is proposed to detect space weak targets in low SCR environment. Coarse-to-fine (CF) [30] framework integrates the advantages of local and nonlocal prior to gradually differentiate small targets from structured edges and unstructured clutters.…”
Section: ) Target Saliency Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the advantage of the proposed approach, nine state-of-the-art algorithms are executed for comparisons in this paper, including NSM [29], WNNM-MC [62], RLCM [26], TDGS [28], CF [30], IPI [37], NIPPS [38], SRWS [40], NWIE [36]. All competing algorithms are executed under fair conditions, and their detailed parameter settings are shown in Table IV.…”
Section: B Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%