2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-023-01389-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for structure determination of GPCRs in various states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To understand the antagonism of MCHR1, we tried to solve the structure of the inactive-state MCHR1 bound to a selective antagonist SNAP-94847. To this end, we applied a previously described strategy 38 to determine this structure by cryo-EM. We engineered the human MCHR1 by inserting mBRIL between TM5 and TM6 to replace the ICL3 in a rigid fashion and fused a K3 helix together with an ALFA tag to H8 of MCHR1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To understand the antagonism of MCHR1, we tried to solve the structure of the inactive-state MCHR1 bound to a selective antagonist SNAP-94847. To this end, we applied a previously described strategy 38 to determine this structure by cryo-EM. We engineered the human MCHR1 by inserting mBRIL between TM5 and TM6 to replace the ICL3 in a rigid fashion and fused a K3 helix together with an ALFA tag to H8 of MCHR1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For structure determination of the antagonist-bond MCHR1, a previously described strategy was applied 38 . To fuse mBRIL to MCHR1 in a rigid fashion, the active-state structure of MCHR1 was aligned with the previous β 2 AR-mBRIL construct.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A characteristic feature of the ET B -CN-FKBP12 complex is the acquired interaction between ET B and calcineurin. In general, receptors and fusion partners are inherently non-interacting combinations and do not interact outside of the fusion point 23, 24 (Extended Data Fig. 4a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current MT 1 and MT 2 structures were obtained in the presence of nonselective agonists only. The XFEL method and recent advances of cryo‐EM methods are likely to enable the acquisition of subtype‐selective and antagonist binding modes, 23,105 which is expected to improve the outcomes of structure‐based drug design. Additionally, the combination of complementary experimental techniques (e.g., crystallography, NMR, and spectroscopy) and computational simulations will help to clarify aspects of MTRs still poorly appreciated, as the identification of allosteric sites, the driving elements for biased signaling and the mechanism of receptor dimerization and oligomerization.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%