2014 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2014.7430916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for daily setup and quality checks of LSO:Ce based time of flight positron emission tomographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the drawbacks that in certain scenarios this intrinsic radioactivity might represent, several authors have proposed its use as a permanent built-in "field-flood" source [11]. Knoess et al [12] and Rothfuss et al [13] measured detector-block sensitivities and crystal energy spectra using the background radioactivity of LSO crystals, suggesting that this intrinsic background signal can be used for daily quality checks in LSO/LYSO-based PET scanners. Conti et al [14], using a conventional 68 Ge external source and the LSO intrinsic radiation, performed energy calibrations of a PET system, establishing that the positions of the 176 Lu peaks in the energy spectrum can be used for energy calibration without any external source and used in a daily quality control protocol of the scanner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the drawbacks that in certain scenarios this intrinsic radioactivity might represent, several authors have proposed its use as a permanent built-in "field-flood" source [11]. Knoess et al [12] and Rothfuss et al [13] measured detector-block sensitivities and crystal energy spectra using the background radioactivity of LSO crystals, suggesting that this intrinsic background signal can be used for daily quality checks in LSO/LYSO-based PET scanners. Conti et al [14], using a conventional 68 Ge external source and the LSO intrinsic radiation, performed energy calibrations of a PET system, establishing that the positions of the 176 Lu peaks in the energy spectrum can be used for energy calibration without any external source and used in a daily quality control protocol of the scanner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, by utilizing simulations based on the identified LYSO 'x' material composition, we can model the radiation transmission through a PET detector accurately. This modeling is instrumental in refining image attenuation correction techniques, as described in the works of Rothfuss et al (2014a) and Omidvari et al (2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calibration of LYSO crystal alignment within the PET system and the alignment of the PET system with respect to a phantom, as elucidated by Wei et al (2016) and Wei et al (2018), relies exclusively on BG radiation measurements. Furthermore, the intrinsic radiation of LYSO has been proposed as a tool for calibrating parameters including depth of interaction (DOI) (Bircher and Shao 2012), flood map estimation, detector sensitivity (Chen et al 2021, Freire et al 2021, timing calibration, and synchronization (Rothfuss et al 2014a, Enríquez-Mier-y Terán et al 2020. Another approach to correctly update for energy calibration drifting via a linear shifting methodology has also been investigated to maintain detector uniformity response, (Conti et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it enables the estimation of the attenuation image from the PET data, if the spatial distribution of the activity is wider than the TOF resolution of the scanner [2]. The use of TOF-PET data requires accurate alignment of the timing information, which is typically obtained by an additional acquisition of a known activity distribution [3], from background LSO radiation [4] or from the clinical data either iteratively [5] or using analytical consistency conditions [6]. This is becoming increasingly important with improving TOF resolutions of clinical TOF-PET scanners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%