2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00274.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-Analysis of the Yield of Capsule Endoscopy Compared to Other Diagnostic Modalities in Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Abstract: CE is superior to push enteroscopy and small bowel barium radiography for diagnosing clinically significant small bowel pathology in patients with OGIB. In study populations, the IY of CE over push enteroscopy and small bowel barium radiography for clinically significant findings is >or=30% with an NNT of 3, primarily due to visualization of additional vascular and inflammatory lesions by CE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
340
3
26

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 581 publications
(382 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
340
3
26
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reported SBCE was superior when compared with push enteroscopy and small bowel barium radiography for OGIB (P < 0.00001) [20] . In detecting Crohn's disease, SBCE was also superior to small bowel barium radiography (P < 0.001), colonoscopy with ileoscopy (P = 0.02) and CT (P = 0.001) [21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported SBCE was superior when compared with push enteroscopy and small bowel barium radiography for OGIB (P < 0.00001) [20] . In detecting Crohn's disease, SBCE was also superior to small bowel barium radiography (P < 0.001), colonoscopy with ileoscopy (P = 0.02) and CT (P = 0.001) [21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CE has established indications in obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), suspected Crohn's disease and small bowel tumors, surveillance in patients with polyposis syndromes, and suspected or refractory malabsorptive syndromes such as celiac disease [3,4]. Its diagnostic yield is very good when compared with other diagnostic methods, and has a positive impact on clinical management [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, the diagnostic yield depends on the enteroscopy completion rates to the cecum.…”
Section: Background and Aimsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Según datos aportados por la literatura, la capacidad que tiene este examen de encontrar lesiones en intestino delgado que expliquen con claridad la pérdida de sangre es de aproximadamente 60% [16][17][18] . Entre las lesiones más frecuentes que se pueden visualizar, se encuentran lesiones vasculares, erosiones y úlceras.…”
unclassified