2009
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200904599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mesoporous Metal–Organic Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
161
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(32 reference statements)
7
161
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1a shows the adsorption isotherms of PP-AC in a gravimetric basis (wt.% methane per weight of dry carbon) for R w 0.6, 1.1 and 1.8 (dry sample was included for the sake of comparison). At this point, it is interesting to highlight that the methane adsorption capacity for the dry carbon at 10 MPa (24 wt.% or 0.24 g g À 1 ) is completely reversible and it is among the highest values ever reported in the literature, even if compared with carbons of similar textural properties or metal-organic frameworks [6][7][8][9][10]18 . Concerning the wet samples and independently of R w , the methane adsorption capacity is low compared with the dry sample at least at low pressures (below 3 MPa), most probably due to pore blocking by preadsorbed water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1a shows the adsorption isotherms of PP-AC in a gravimetric basis (wt.% methane per weight of dry carbon) for R w 0.6, 1.1 and 1.8 (dry sample was included for the sake of comparison). At this point, it is interesting to highlight that the methane adsorption capacity for the dry carbon at 10 MPa (24 wt.% or 0.24 g g À 1 ) is completely reversible and it is among the highest values ever reported in the literature, even if compared with carbons of similar textural properties or metal-organic frameworks [6][7][8][9][10]18 . Concerning the wet samples and independently of R w , the methane adsorption capacity is low compared with the dry sample at least at low pressures (below 3 MPa), most probably due to pore blocking by preadsorbed water.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…An alternative solution concerns the use of porous materials to store NG (adsorbed natural gas (ANG)) at a similar high density, but substantially lower pressure. Unfortunately, actual storage on porous solids, mainly metal-organic frameworks and carbon materials, exhibits certain limitations, at least in a gravimetric basis, to fulfil the new methane program from the US Department of Energy (see DOE MOVE program at https://arpa-e-foa.energy.gov) [5][6][7][8][9][10] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar values (0.230 g/g at 100 bar and 298K) were reported for a mesoporous MOF with defined, modular pore system and a large pore volume of 2.02 cm 3 /g. 5 The gravimetric value is low because authors have used the crystal density of the material − in some cases above 2.0 g/cm 3 − to calculate the apparently high volumetric capacity. Despite the potential of MOFs for highpressure methane storage, these materials are characterized, except for some specific cases, by a low mechanical stability under pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same metal, di erent organic linkers render di erent metal cluster and di erent structure in turn, such as Zn-tetramer of MOF-5 and Zn-dimer of Zn-HKUST-1 [5,6]. Compared with H 2 BDC (H 2 BDC = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid) [7][8][9][10], the non-linear FDA (FDA = furan-2,5-dicarboxylic acid) possesses two advantages as molecular building block: the high openness net with the exible bond angle of two carboxyl (126°) and the polarity owing to the oxygen atom of furan ring, which is potentially applied for gas-storage and gasseparation. In this work, a 2-dimensional coordination polymer [Zn(DMI)(FDA)] (DMI = 1,3-dimethyl-2-imidazolidinone) containing the paddle-wheel Zn-dimer, has been synthesized with DMI as the solvent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%