2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05217-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mechanism for oxidative damage repair at gene regulatory elements

Abstract: Oxidative genome damage is an unavoidable consequence of cellular metabolism.Promoters and enhancers are regions in the genome that are critical for converting the information stored in DNA to proteins essential for life. The formation and repair of oxidative DNA damage at promoters is important for this essential decoding process; however, we don't currently understand how it takes place. This study identifies a process that fulfils this function and describes its implication in disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data also indicate that not only the origin of DSBs at promoters are different from gene body but also how these DSBs are processed, consisting with a recent report showing that promoters are prone to oxidative damage and are protected by NuMA (Ray et al ., 2022). These observations are proposing a model inwhich DNA damage and repair are subjected to different ‘rules’ at different regions across the gene.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our data also indicate that not only the origin of DSBs at promoters are different from gene body but also how these DSBs are processed, consisting with a recent report showing that promoters are prone to oxidative damage and are protected by NuMA (Ray et al ., 2022). These observations are proposing a model inwhich DNA damage and repair are subjected to different ‘rules’ at different regions across the gene.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A possible mechanism could be that R-loops and TOP1 themselves could accumulate SSBs at both strands leading to DSBs. Another posibility is that SSBs induced by TOP1 and R-loops could be adjacent to SSBs induced by other agents such as oxidative damage (Ray et al ., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may drive genome damage and prompts repair by recruiting X-ray repair cross-complementing protein 1 and PARP1. Yet, limiting the PARylation at the initiating polymerase II complexes is necessary for the transcription of immediate-early genes and depends on the activity of the nuclear mitotic apparatus protein NuMA [ 63 ]. The increased detection of M+5 ADPr after zymosan stimulation and the high expression of PARG mRNA suggest a wide recycling of poly(ADPr) to maintain a pattern of PARylated proteins consistent with the required phenotype and reliant on metabolic intermediates [ 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These modifications could alter cellular function by regulating stability, activity, subcellular localization or the protein-protein interaction of oxidized proteins [2]. A wide range of cellular mechanisms are activated to eliminate ROS as well as the ROS-mediated oxidized biomolecules (such as the newly discovered protection of promoters from oxidative damage though the action of the nuclear mitotic apparatus protein, NuMA [3]). Nonetheless, upon persistent activation these mechanisms may either aggravate the cellular damage or become impaired, eventually leading to a vicious cycle that promotes the progression of several pathologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%