A measure of knowledge and confidence in relation to HIV and AIDS: Reliability and validity

Abstract

Knowledge of HIV and AIDS is widely seen as an important determinant of anxiety about such infection in health care workers. However, existing measures of this knowledge suffer from a number of methodological problems and few demonstrate adequate reliability and validity. This paper documents the development of a new measure detailing its reliability and validity. Knowledge, and also confidence in knowledge, were assessed across seven domains of relevant information (e.g. epidemiology, personal risk, symptomatology) in one non-expert group (non-medical undergraduate psychologist) and in three groups with greater expertise (nursing students and third year and final year medical students). The measure was shown to be reliable and to discriminate between the four groups in a manner consistent with the level of education received by each group and in terms of both the scale scores for the seven domains and the individual items. In general, final year medical students were shown to be more knowledgeable, and more confident in their knowledge, than the other groups. The non-medical undergraduates showed the lowest level of knowledge. In general, the groups appeared under-confident in their knowledge about HIV/AIDS. This was interpreted in terms of members of these groups exhibiting caution and the perceived fluctuating nature of the HIV knowledge base. Implications for the training of health care workers in relation to HIV/AIDS are discussed.

A measure of informed choice

“…Such a measure would comprise a self‐report of knowledge, as opposed to a knowledge test. Research in other areas, however, casts doubt on such a goal, showing that the association between what people know and their estimates of this knowledge is positive but not perfect, with people tending to overestimate how much they know 28,29 . It may, however, be possible to generate a template of information about any screening test that is a prerequisite to informed choice.…”

Are Patients Making High-Quality Decisions about Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy? [Outcomes Article]

“…18-20 Each of these studies has found that people's perceptions of their knowledge about a specific topic tend to be higher than their actual knowledge levels. This tendency to overestimate one's knowledge underscores the importance of knowledge measures that ask questions about specific facts, rather than asking only how informed a person feels.…”

Sex and Sexual Orientation

“…These items were comprised of one symptomatology question (from Ferguson et al, 1995), with the remaining items concerned with HIV transmission and misconceptions taken from the ''AIDS Risk Knowledge Questionnaire'' (Kelly et al, 1989). For this sample, the coefficient alpha was .43 and the mean inter-item correlation was .10.…”