2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11099.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A maximum-likelihood method for fitting colour–magnitude diagrams

Abstract: We present a maximum-likelihood method for fitting two-dimensional model distributions to stellar data in colour-magnitude space. This allows one to include (for example) binary stars in an isochronal population. The method also allows one to derive formal uncertainties for fitted parameters, and assess the likelihood that a good fit has been found. We use the method to derive an age of 38.5 +3.5 −6.5 Myr and a true distance modulus of 7.79 +0.11 −0.05 mag from the V versus V − I diagram of NGC 2547 (the uncer… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
187
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
5
187
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By doing it for all observed stars, one can recover the SFRs, which maximise the likelihood between data and model. It is interesting to note that in recent years there have been an increasing number of papers applying this kind of technique to a wide range of problems, which include determinating the physical parameters of stellar clusters (Jørgensen & Lindegren 2005;Naylor & Jeffries 2006;Hernandez & Valls-Gabaud 2008) and of individual stars (Nordström et al 2004;da Silva et al 2006).…”
Section: Recovering the Sfhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing it for all observed stars, one can recover the SFRs, which maximise the likelihood between data and model. It is interesting to note that in recent years there have been an increasing number of papers applying this kind of technique to a wide range of problems, which include determinating the physical parameters of stellar clusters (Jørgensen & Lindegren 2005;Naylor & Jeffries 2006;Hernandez & Valls-Gabaud 2008) and of individual stars (Nordström et al 2004;da Silva et al 2006).…”
Section: Recovering the Sfhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Naylor & Jeffries (2006) used a MLE to fit colour-magnitude diagrams, Arzner et al (2007) to improve the determination of faint X-ray spectra, Makarov et al (2006) to improve distance estimates using red giant branch stars, and López-Sanjuan et al (2008, 2009a,b, 2010b) to estimate reliable merger fractions from morphological criteria. The MLEs are based on the estimation of the most probable values of a set of parameters, which define the probability distribution that describes an observational sample.…”
Section: Of the Cosmic Variance σ Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several distance estimates, from 360-480 pc, are available in the literature (Claria 1982;Shobbrook 1986;Lyra et al 2006;Naylor & Jeffries 2006;van Leeuwen 2009). An accurate age of 35 ± 3 Myr has been derived from the lithium-depletion boundary (Jeffries & Oliveira 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%