A Mathematical Model for Ballast Tamping Decision Making in Railway Tracks

Abstract

Ballast tamping is considered as an important maintenance process for railway infrastructures and has a large influence on the capacity of any railway networks. But optimizing the plan of that process is a complex problem with a high cost. This paper discusses optimizing tamping operations on ballasted tracks to improve the track geometry and reduce the total maintenance cost. A mathematical model for this problem in the literature is improved here by including the restriction on the resources (tools, workers and budget) in the model and including constant/variable values for track possession cost and available resources. The optimal solutions obtained for all instances are found by using the global optimization. Besides, a numerical study is presented to test and evaluate the model performance. The results show that the proposed model can be adopted by the infrastructure manager (IM) to make suitable tamping scheduling decisions under normal or private conditions; however, the private conditions lead to an increase of the final cost compared to that of the normal ones. Doi: 10.28991/cej-2020-03091601 Full Text: PDF

Measurement Model for Determining the Disparity Factors of Intercity Railway Transportation

“…Based on our findings, we propose the following guidelines: (1) Policies should focus on developing infrastructure that efficiently connects the railway transportation system (e.g., road network development) to enhance accessibility [122]. (2) Policies should emphasize the development of an integrated public transportation system that seamlessly connects to the railway transportation system (e.g., public buses), and (3) Policies should prioritize the development of railway route networks to provide equal coverage and service across regions in Thailand.…”

Data‐driven maintenance planning and scheduling based on predicted railway track condition

“…The binary decision variable 𝑋 𝑠,𝑝 indicates if segment s is selected for tamping in planning period p, shown in Equation (4).…”

“…Thus, the maintenance interventions affect the train schedule, and traffic may be further disrupted by acute corrective maintenance. The planning of preventive track maintenance actions starts months before execution to use available maintenance windows 3,4 . For example, in Sweden, the Swedish Transport Administration (STA) creates tamping maintenance intervention plans 3 at least one year into the future based on track condition measurements.…”