2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A marker of growth differs between adolescents with high vs. low sugar preference

Abstract: Sweet preference is higher in childhood than adulthood but the mechanism for this developmental shift is not known. The objective of this study was to assess perceptual, physiological and eating habit differences between children preferring solutions high in sugar (high preference) and children preferring solutions low in sugar (low preference). We tested 143 children (11-to 15-years old) using sip and spit methodology to assess their hedonic profile, detection threshold, and perceived intensity of sucrose. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
83
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The high level of satisfaction (both expected and actual) reported by children and seniors could, indeed, reflect their well documented sweet-tooth, that is their stronger preference for sugar, compared to adolescents and adults (e.g., Coldwell, Oswald, & Reed, 2009;Desor & Beauchamp, 1987;Walter & Soliah, 1995). In this regard, an interesting topic for future research could be to investigate whether the subjective attractiveness or utility (positive versus negative) of the choice item can mitigate the overchoice effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high level of satisfaction (both expected and actual) reported by children and seniors could, indeed, reflect their well documented sweet-tooth, that is their stronger preference for sugar, compared to adolescents and adults (e.g., Coldwell, Oswald, & Reed, 2009;Desor & Beauchamp, 1987;Walter & Soliah, 1995). In this regard, an interesting topic for future research could be to investigate whether the subjective attractiveness or utility (positive versus negative) of the choice item can mitigate the overchoice effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is supported by evidence that adolescents with higher sweet preferences also have higher levels of a biomarker for bone growth than do those with lower sweet preferences [21] . Because this biomarker increases during growth spurts, age-related declines in preference for sweet taste may correspond with cessation of physical growth [22,23] .…”
Section: Sweet Tastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These responses are intensified during childhood and, we argue, reflect the nutritional problem of attracting children to foods that contain energy, minerals, and vitamins (e.g., mother's milk, fruits) during periods of maximal growth [13,14].…”
Section: Recent Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%