2006 14th Annual IEEE Symposium on Field-Programmable Custom Computing Machines 2006
DOI: 10.1109/fccm.2006.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Low-Energy Reconfigurable Fabric for the SuperCISC Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also targeted 5:1, 3553:1 and 355:1 multiplexer-based interconnects as described in Section 3. A detailed study of varying other parameters of the fabric such as the bit-width the ALUs can be found in [13]. Table 1 provides a summary of the area requirements of the benchmarks mapped to the fabric using the different multiplexing cardinalities and using the previously mentioned mapping strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We also targeted 5:1, 3553:1 and 355:1 multiplexer-based interconnects as described in Section 3. A detailed study of varying other parameters of the fabric such as the bit-width the ALUs can be found in [13]. Table 1 provides a summary of the area requirements of the benchmarks mapped to the fabric using the different multiplexing cardinalities and using the previously mentioned mapping strategies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy required by the optimized fabric is within about 5-10X of an ASIC implementation and is 10X better than a Xilinx Virtex II Pro FPGA and 100X better than an Intel XScale processor operating at 733 MHz. A more detailed discussion of the tradeoffs of the reconfigurable fabric versus the ASIC, FPGA and embedded processor implementations can be found in [13].…”
Section: Fabric Technology Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Stripe-based fabrics in particular (e.g., see Figure 2) are quite promising due to their good fit to a data flow graph structure [5,25,8,9]. When a data flow graph is mapped to a stripe-style structure, however, data dependency edges often traverse multiple rows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%