2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00002-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A longitudinal study of time trends in the eruption of permanent teeth in Danish children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
52
3
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
52
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are doubly censored: neither the exact date of tooth emergence nor the moment at which a caries lesion fulfi lled the clinical criteria for being diagnosed as caries is exactly known. As it has been demonstrated that in case of censored data a midpoint approach may lead to invalid inferences [Parner et al, 2001], we opted not to compute point estimates, but to enter timing of emergence and caries experience as interval-censored data in the analyses. Based on the clinical eruption stage at the moment of examination, the left side of the time interval during which the permanent fi rst molar had pierced the gums was approximated for every permanent fi rst molar: P1: [age at examination minus 0.25 year;age at examination]; P2: [age at examination minus 0.50 year;age at examination]; P3: [age at examination minus 1.00 year;age at examination]; P4: [5 years old;age at examination].…”
Section: Data Analysis Outcome Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are doubly censored: neither the exact date of tooth emergence nor the moment at which a caries lesion fulfi lled the clinical criteria for being diagnosed as caries is exactly known. As it has been demonstrated that in case of censored data a midpoint approach may lead to invalid inferences [Parner et al, 2001], we opted not to compute point estimates, but to enter timing of emergence and caries experience as interval-censored data in the analyses. Based on the clinical eruption stage at the moment of examination, the left side of the time interval during which the permanent fi rst molar had pierced the gums was approximated for every permanent fi rst molar: P1: [age at examination minus 0.25 year;age at examination]; P2: [age at examination minus 0.50 year;age at examination]; P3: [age at examination minus 1.00 year;age at examination]; P4: [5 years old;age at examination].…”
Section: Data Analysis Outcome Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collected data enabled the production of valid information about the presence of first permanent molars, according to the age cohorts defined in intervals of six months, separated into boys and girls. In certain studies, this information was produced from annual exams 11,12 . Using the data obtained in conjunction with the educational system, it is possible to estimate the number of children and emerged molars that require attention and surveillance, using specific measures which must be object of more in-depth studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a different study 11 , which followed the same type of design, although with a much larger sample (more than 30,000 records of children from the public dental service of Denmark), emergence of all permanent teeth was described. Authors concluded that teeth emerge firstly in girls, rather than in boys -the difference varied between two to ten months, without a clear dependence on the age of tooth emergence or type of tooth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the secular trend exists, correction of the reference standard that was developed using an affluent segment of more developed nations is significant for forensics, if the subject for which a dental age estimate is necessary is from a lower socioeconomic status in a developing country [72]. However, the other authors claimed that the level of tooth formation is not affected by secular trend, as it is predominantly determined by genetics, and less affected by environmental factors than other growth systems [73].…”
Section: Scoring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%