1986
|
Sign up to set email alerts
A Longitudinal, Behavioral Study of Senile Dementia of the Alzheimer Type
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
87
9
6
5
Citation Types
7
39
0
0
Year Published
Range
1987
19872026
2026Publication Types
Select...
96
7
4
Relationship
0
107
Authors
Journals
Cited by 107 publications
(46 citation statements)
References 8 publications
7
39
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lowest specificity was for the constructional praxis test, which also had a low sensitivity. Our data are in accordance with those of a study including people with less than 12 years of education 17 , except for a higher score in verbal fluency (14.4) and a lower score (8.8) in praxis. Table 3 shows that there was a wide range variation for all tests.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lowest specificity was for the constructional praxis test, which also had a low sensitivity. Our data are in accordance with those of a study including people with less than 12 years of education 17 , except for a higher score in verbal fluency (14.4) and a lower score (8.8) in praxis. Table 3 shows that there was a wide range variation for all tests.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The annual change of the MMSE score covered a broad range without any signifi cant difference between presenile and senile AD (table 1). The existence of patients with fast cognitive decline and others whose decline is small or negligible is in agreement with results of other authors [22][23][24][25]. The rate of cognitive decline did not depend on age at onset which is also in accordance with other studies [20,26], Thus, the present data suggest that other factors reflecting the heterogeneity in AD may influence the rate of annual cognitive decline in AD.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…At the extremes of this distribution were subjects whose decline was very rapid and others where the decline was negligible. This is in agreement with other studies 27,28 . Botwinick et al 28 described a subgroup of five out of 18 patients with mild AD who progressed very little over a four‐year period.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in agreement with other studies 27,28 . Botwinick et al 28 described a subgroup of five out of 18 patients with mild AD who progressed very little over a four‐year period. Four possible explanations for this lack of progression were given: (1) that these patients were at one end of a normal spectrum; (2) that they were less severely demented to start with; (3) the duration of disease was less in this group; and (4) that they represented an identifiable subgroup of AD, ie “slow or non‐progressive.” In invoking the same explanations for non‐progression in our group, it can be seen that the second and third explanations are not supported but both the first and last explanations remain possibilities.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lowest specificity was for the constructional praxis test, which also had a low sensitivity. Our data are in accordance with those of a study including people with less than 12 years of education 17 , except for a higher score in verbal fluency (14.4) and a lower score (8.8) in praxis. Table 3 shows that there was a wide range variation for all tests.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The annual change of the MMSE score covered a broad range without any signifi cant difference between presenile and senile AD (table 1). The existence of patients with fast cognitive decline and others whose decline is small or negligible is in agreement with results of other authors [22][23][24][25]. The rate of cognitive decline did not depend on age at onset which is also in accordance with other studies [20,26], Thus, the present data suggest that other factors reflecting the heterogeneity in AD may influence the rate of annual cognitive decline in AD.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…At the extremes of this distribution were subjects whose decline was very rapid and others where the decline was negligible. This is in agreement with other studies 27,28 . Botwinick et al 28 described a subgroup of five out of 18 patients with mild AD who progressed very little over a four‐year period.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in agreement with other studies 27,28 . Botwinick et al 28 described a subgroup of five out of 18 patients with mild AD who progressed very little over a four‐year period. Four possible explanations for this lack of progression were given: (1) that these patients were at one end of a normal spectrum; (2) that they were less severely demented to start with; (3) the duration of disease was less in this group; and (4) that they represented an identifiable subgroup of AD, ie “slow or non‐progressive.” In invoking the same explanations for non‐progression in our group, it can be seen that the second and third explanations are not supported but both the first and last explanations remain possibilities.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The lowest specificity was for the constructional praxis test, which also had a low sensitivity. Our data are in accordance with those of a study including people with less than 12 years of education 17 , except for a higher score in verbal fluency (14.4) and a lower score (8.8) in praxis. Table 3 shows that there was a wide range variation for all tests.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The annual change of the MMSE score covered a broad range without any signifi cant difference between presenile and senile AD (table 1). The existence of patients with fast cognitive decline and others whose decline is small or negligible is in agreement with results of other authors [22][23][24][25]. The rate of cognitive decline did not depend on age at onset which is also in accordance with other studies [20,26], Thus, the present data suggest that other factors reflecting the heterogeneity in AD may influence the rate of annual cognitive decline in AD.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…At the extremes of this distribution were subjects whose decline was very rapid and others where the decline was negligible. This is in agreement with other studies 27,28 . Botwinick et al 28 described a subgroup of five out of 18 patients with mild AD who progressed very little over a four‐year period.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in agreement with other studies 27,28 . Botwinick et al 28 described a subgroup of five out of 18 patients with mild AD who progressed very little over a four‐year period. Four possible explanations for this lack of progression were given: (1) that these patients were at one end of a normal spectrum; (2) that they were less severely demented to start with; (3) the duration of disease was less in this group; and (4) that they represented an identifiable subgroup of AD, ie “slow or non‐progressive.” In invoking the same explanations for non‐progression in our group, it can be seen that the second and third explanations are not supported but both the first and last explanations remain possibilities.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%