2012
DOI: 10.1163/15406253-03903003 View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
|

Abstract: A. C. Graham thinks that the parallelism in the Neo-Moist Canons is about the deduction of sentences. On the contrary, Chad Hansen thinks that they are not plausibly treated as inference of deductive forms since the later Moists are at pains to show that they can “go wrong.” In this article, I shall try to provide a logical analysis and a constructive rather than defeatist interpretation of parallelism in the text. I argue that the Moists tend to express their ideas in the “material mode of speech” to build up… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance
Select...
0
0
0

Publication Types

Select...

Relationship

0
0

Authors

Journals