2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00494-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A left-hand advantage for self-description: the impact of schizotypal personality traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ownership appeared to prime left-hand responses, but interfere with right-hand responses. While this effect was unanticipated, it is consistent with several previous studies that have found a left-hand advantage for responding to self-related stimuli (e.g., Keenan et al 1999;Keenan et al 2001;Platek et al 2003). Such effects suggests that the effect observed in the present experiment is not a specific effect of body ownership as such, but rather a generic effect of self-related stimuli.…”
Section: Ownership and The Right Hemispheresupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Ownership appeared to prime left-hand responses, but interfere with right-hand responses. While this effect was unanticipated, it is consistent with several previous studies that have found a left-hand advantage for responding to self-related stimuli (e.g., Keenan et al 1999;Keenan et al 2001;Platek et al 2003). Such effects suggests that the effect observed in the present experiment is not a specific effect of body ownership as such, but rather a generic effect of self-related stimuli.…”
Section: Ownership and The Right Hemispheresupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Consistent with this observation, self-face recognition is associated with distinct patterns of behavioral performance [4][5][6][7] and neural activation [8][9][10][11] as compared with the recognition of others' faces. Further, numerous studies have reported that patients with schizophrenia [12,13] and normal individuals with schizotypal personality [14][15][16] are impaired in self-face recognition. Because self faces are not only highly familiar [17] but also self-related [18], two related but distinct theories have been proposed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because self faces are not only highly familiar [17] but also self-related [18], two related but distinct theories have been proposed. One interpretation is that the poor performance reflects deficits in recognizing the familiarity of self faces (i.e., a deficit in the sense of familiarity) [19,20], whereas the other argues that the disrupted behavior arises from the breakdown of self-awareness in schizophrenia (i.e., a deficit in the sense of self) [13,16]. To test these two alternatives, we adopted a paradigm to exclude the effect of general cognitive ability and to decouple self-face recognition into two component processes, the sense of familiarity and the sense of self.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El hecho de que las dimensiones Cognitivo-perceptiva y de Desorganización de la esquizotipia correlacionen significativamente con fallos el reconocimiento de caras confirman también el carácter continuo de este fenómeno, siendo más acusados los fallos en el reconocimiento del self que ocurren en la esquizofrenia que en la esquizotipia (Platek, Myers, Critton, & Gallup, 2003). Si bien la relación entre el reconocimiento de la propia cara y de la cara de otras personas y los factores Cognitivo-perceptivo y de Desorganización fue estudiada por primera ver por Larøi y colaboradores, a nivel teórico, Sass y Parnas (2003) ya habían sugerido que los síntomas Cognitivo-perceptivos y de Desorganización están asociados con anormalidades en la experiencia del self.…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified