1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1976.tb00327.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Least-Squares Method to find a Remanence Direction from Converging Remagnetization Circles

Abstract: The direction of a secondary magnetization component is found from the intersection point of converging remagnetization circles using a method based on the least-squares fitting of great circles to points on a sphere. The technique may be applied to any problem that requires the best intersection point of convergent great circles and is thus useful in other fields besides palaeomagnetism, such as structural geology, plate tectonics and astronomy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
123
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
123
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a ChRM direction (Fig. 4c) could be calculated using the converging remagnetization circles technique of Halls (1976) and McFadden and McElhinny (1988).…”
Section: Palaeomagnetic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a ChRM direction (Fig. 4c) could be calculated using the converging remagnetization circles technique of Halls (1976) and McFadden and McElhinny (1988).…”
Section: Palaeomagnetic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ChRM of type C specimens were analyzed using Fisherian statistics [30]. A less reliable type showed two overlapping magnetic components thus showing demagnetization trajectories that do not go to the origin (type D); it was analyzed using statistical methods of remagnetization circles [31,32]. Finally, specimens with the least reliable paleomagnetic behavior were discarded (type E).…”
Section: Demagnetization Techniques and Paleomagnetic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McGuire ( 1989) based his original interpretation of the demagnetisation data on the premise that the primary, detrital component of magnetisation was the highest blocking temperature component. He made significant use of great circles analysis (Halls 1976(Halls , 1978McFadden & McElhinny 1988) to interpret data that had not reached a stable endpoint before thermal alteration occurred. The overall result of his analysis was a rather noisy, mixed polarity record that was difficult to correlate with the geomagnetic polarity timescale.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%