2013
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2013.2259594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Learning Scheme for Reach to Grasp Movements: On EMG-Based Interfaces Using Task Specific Motion Decoding Models

Abstract: A learning scheme based on random forests is used to discriminate between different reach to grasp movements in 3-D space, based on the myoelectric activity of human muscles of the upper-arm and the forearm. Task specificity for motion decoding is introduced in two different levels: Subspace to move toward and object to be grasped. The discrimination between the different reach to grasp strategies is accomplished with machine learning techniques for classification. The classification decision is then used in o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies [17,19,26,36], presented different approaches for mapping EMG signals to reaching and grasping motions according to object's features and locations and during static or dynamic gestures. In these approaches, the system is trained as the subject is asked to perform a grasp type, with or without holding an object, and stay there for a few seconds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies [17,19,26,36], presented different approaches for mapping EMG signals to reaching and grasping motions according to object's features and locations and during static or dynamic gestures. In these approaches, the system is trained as the subject is asked to perform a grasp type, with or without holding an object, and stay there for a few seconds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As result, these devices would increase their effectiveness and usability, and consequently increase the natural transition between the reaching and grasping phase on the prostheses increasing their acceptance by patients. However, at the moment only a limited number of studies focused on the detection of different grasp movements during reaching and grasping motions [25][26][27], and no measurement were performed to assess when a good classification was achieved respect to the hand's preshape .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these approaches is based on surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded from the forearm [20]. While such an approach could potentially be used in a large variety of environments, including outdoors, its signal quality may degrade due to many environmental factors, such as sweating and electrical noise, which has been shown to drastically affect its performance [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the support from the assistive system is always provided after the initiation of the actual movement when using "assistance-as-needed" strategy, the operator and the system are not well-coupled, and the process of corporation between them demonstrates some degree of passivity [14], [15]. Other ways to predict the wearers' movement intention of the powered assistive exoskeletons are based on physiological signals, such as electromyography (EMG) signals [16], [17] and electroencephalography (EEG) signals [18], [19]. EMG signals can reflect the levels of activation of muscles and are highly related to the muscle contraction force [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%