2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A hydrodynamics-based model of a rowing stroke simulating effects of drag and lift on oar blade efficiency for various cant angles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the propulsive force, F propulsive = m Total /a rowing , the average acceleration of 3.12 m/s 2 with the total mass of 88 kg (70 kg (Single rower) + 14 kg (Scull boat) + 4 kg (Oar and equipment)) produced 274 N force. This value is valid based on the estimated blade force ranging between 107-393 N as reported in the previous studies [25,36,44,47,55,56]. However, 274 N of blade force from the calculation is considered after 20 % energy loss, hence, before losses happen the initial blade force generated will be 308 N [24].…”
Section: Boat Velocitymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Based on the propulsive force, F propulsive = m Total /a rowing , the average acceleration of 3.12 m/s 2 with the total mass of 88 kg (70 kg (Single rower) + 14 kg (Scull boat) + 4 kg (Oar and equipment)) produced 274 N force. This value is valid based on the estimated blade force ranging between 107-393 N as reported in the previous studies [25,36,44,47,55,56]. However, 274 N of blade force from the calculation is considered after 20 % energy loss, hence, before losses happen the initial blade force generated will be 308 N [24].…”
Section: Boat Velocitymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Yet the results are unphysical at some point, especially for the propulsive force which is momentarily and unexpectedly negative. This default was corrected in another paper published later [20]. Leroyer et al [8] performed simulations reproducing a simplified rowing stroke but with a dynamic similar to a real one, especially for the free surface deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Côté numérique, l'augmentation de la puissance des moyens de calculs et la maturité grandissante des outils de simulation numérique (encore dénommés CFD pour Computational Fluid Dynamics) rendent possibles des simulations prenant en compte des mouvements complexes de corps de forme quelconque en présence d'une surface libre fortement perturbée (Sliasas & Tullis, 2010 ;Kinoshita et al, 2007). Au Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides (LMF), les premières validations numériques, s'appuyant sur la comparaison avec des essais en bassin ont ainsi permis de mettre en évidence les deux influences fondamentales (instationnarité et surface libre) mettant ainsi en défaut les modèles reposant sur une approche quasi-statique.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified