2020
DOI: 10.1109/tte.2020.2990573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Homogeneous Model for Estimating Eddy-Current Losses in Wound Core of Multilevel-Circle Section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In formula (21), P h0 , P e0 , and P a0 are the measured hysteresis, eddy-current, and additional loss of the wound core; K h , K e , and K a are the hysteresis, eddy-current, and additional loss coefficients, respectively; β is the hysteresis engineering experience coefficient, which will change with the structure, capacity, and operating conditions of the transformer, and the value range is about 1.5-3.0. K h , β, and K a need to carry out multiple tests under different magnetic flux densities, and obtain reliable values with the help of mathematical methods of polynomial interpolation fitting; K e is closely related to the frequency f. It is directly calculated by formula (23), where δ 0 is the skin depth.…”
Section: Loss Measurement and Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In formula (21), P h0 , P e0 , and P a0 are the measured hysteresis, eddy-current, and additional loss of the wound core; K h , K e , and K a are the hysteresis, eddy-current, and additional loss coefficients, respectively; β is the hysteresis engineering experience coefficient, which will change with the structure, capacity, and operating conditions of the transformer, and the value range is about 1.5-3.0. K h , β, and K a need to carry out multiple tests under different magnetic flux densities, and obtain reliable values with the help of mathematical methods of polynomial interpolation fitting; K e is closely related to the frequency f. It is directly calculated by formula (23), where δ 0 is the skin depth.…”
Section: Loss Measurement and Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the decisive influence of boundary conditions on electromagnetic problems, a collapsing change will occur in the resolution of electromagnetic parameters using the above method blamed for more complicated boundary conditions. Gao [21] analytically solved the homogeneous distribution of eddy-current in circular-section wound cores at low and high frequencies using Bessel functions. However, due to the properties of Bessel functions, it cannot represent the uneven eddy current distribution in the core caused by the different magnetic circuit lengths of each layer of silicon steel sheets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To verify the correctness of the correction coefficients proposed in Section 3 and the accuracy of the correction model. The loss of the nanocrystalline core was calculated according to equation (10) which was considered the trapezoidal waveform rise time coefficients and the experimental measurements were analyzed by comparing them with the calculated results.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of a Higher-order Loss Separation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss mathematical model provides a microscopic analysis of the magnetization process, focusing on the factors that influence losses, including the classical Steinmetz empirical equation and the Bertotti loss separation model. Reference [10] describes the equivalent electromagnetic parameters of multi-stage circular crosssection winding cores at different frequencies. The Bertotti loss separation model has fewer parameters and clearer physical significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harmonic current impact for distribution transformers is also studied for determining no-load losses [13]. Innovative methods for measuring no-load losses for different transformers is studied [14][15][16]. This type of core loss modelling is also vital for usage in precise applications like fault current limiters as studied in the Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%