2007
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.117143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A history of loss of consciousness or post-traumatic amnesia in minor head injury: "conditio sine qua non" or one of the risk factors?

Abstract: Objective: A history of loss of consciousness (LOC) or post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) is commonly considered a prerequisite for minor head injury (MHI), although neurocranial complications also occur when LOC/PTA are absent, particularly in the presence of other risk factors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether known risk factors for complications after MHI in the absence of LOC/PTA have the same predictive value as when LOC/PTA are present. Methods: A prospective multicentre study was performed in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
17
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The RR ratio for headache increased for the no LOC/PTA subgroup compared with the LOC/PTA subgroup but not when compared with the whole group. These findings concur with those of Smits et al ,7 namely that common clinical correlates may be important markers for intracranial abnormality on CT in the cohort of patients without LOC or PTA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RR ratio for headache increased for the no LOC/PTA subgroup compared with the LOC/PTA subgroup but not when compared with the whole group. These findings concur with those of Smits et al ,7 namely that common clinical correlates may be important markers for intracranial abnormality on CT in the cohort of patients without LOC or PTA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The addition of other clinical correlates (eg, vomiting, nausea or headache) in patients with LOC or PTA should in theory increase the sensitivity of identifying GCS 15 patients with traumatic CT abnormalities. This assumption was tested by Smits et al 7 in a multicentre prospective study that enrolled 2462 patients. One thousand seven hundred and eight patients had either LOC or PTA, 754 patients had neither.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open or depressed skull fracture (0.2%; CI <0.0001% to 1.25%; p=0.0221) has been found to be highly significant by other studies (p<0.0001); however, few skull fractures were found in our study population (one patient only; 0.2%; CI <0.0001% to 1.25%) 5 23…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 46%
“…16,20,21,45,55 Many investigations, including some earlier Rochester Epidemiology Project studies, required evidence of at least minimal loss of consciousness or post-traumatic amnesia to qualify as a case. 30,31,35,56 The requirement minimizes the proportion of false-positive cases that some authors caution can occur because symptoms following head injury are inflated by patient expectations or comorbid stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24,27 In light of increasing evidence of adverse outcomes following symptomatic events, the large numbers reported here also substantiate heightened concerns in the press and literature regarding implications, both at the individual and population level. 21,58 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%