2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A highly sensitive label-free amperometric biosensor for norfloxacin detection based on chitosan-yttria nanocomposite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed biosensor was used to detect trace amounts of the antibiotic norfloxacin. The diagnostic characteristics of the fabricated sensor when measured using differential pulse voltammetry proved to be better compared to previously described biosensors and commercially available EIA in terms of sensitivity and a lower detection limit [118].…”
Section: The Use Of Physico-chemical Methods For the Development Of Immunosensorsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The developed biosensor was used to detect trace amounts of the antibiotic norfloxacin. The diagnostic characteristics of the fabricated sensor when measured using differential pulse voltammetry proved to be better compared to previously described biosensors and commercially available EIA in terms of sensitivity and a lower detection limit [118].…”
Section: The Use Of Physico-chemical Methods For the Development Of Immunosensorsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…177 In this method, the electron movement on account of biochemical reactions, and the immobilization of biological analytes, both occur on the electrodes. [178][179][180] Based on operating principles, electrochemical biosensors are divided into four types-potentiometric, amperometric, conductimetric, and impedimetric. 181,182 The first diagnostic biosensor was established in 1967 for blood glucose levels detection employing natural human enzyme (glucose oxidase) using an electrochemical detector.…”
Section: Interleukins: Biomarkers Of Clinical Usesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated D value for the MIP/ITO electrode was found to be higher, i.e., 2.97 × 10 −11 cm 2 s −1 , in comparison to that for the NIP/ITO electrode, i.e., 2.16 × 10 −11 cm 2 s −1 showing a high electron transfer rate at the electrode surface/electrolyte. Moreover, the Brown-Anson formula was utilized for calculating the surface concentration of the absorbed ionic electroactive species (I*) as depicted in eqn (9); 52 Ae ¼…”
Section: Scan Rate Studymentioning
confidence: 99%