“…Some shortcomings of these methods, such as expensive, complex, and unbefitting for real clinical analysis (Da Costa et al, ), are undeniable. By contrast, electrochemical biosensor is an attractive alternative due to its simplicity, low cost, excellent selectivity, and high sensitivity (Wang, Gao, Sun, & Xu, ; Xu, Liu, Su, Liu, & Qiu, ; Zhao, Yu, Tian, & Xu, ). Electrochemical applications of biosensors such as uric acid biosensors based on enzyme catalytic reactions are reported in the documents (Brusova, Ferapontova, Sakharov, Magner, & Gorton, ; Dai, Bao, & Yang, ; Dung, Patil, & Duong, ; Shimomura, Itoh, & Sumiya, ).…”