2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A highly sensitive and flexible magnetic nanoprobe labeled immunochromatographic assay platform for pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be altered if a smartphone camera is used as a detector which has been the case for both pesticides (Comina et al, 2016) and mycotoxins (Machado et al, 2018). In fact when reviewing the portable axes of the TEST system, colorimetric techniques currently prevail with microorganisms (Liu et al, 2015) (Wu et al, 2015) (Jiang et al, 2016) and mycotoxins (Zhang et al, 2018) (Liu et al, 2017) (Song et al, 2014) being the most mentioned targets. As for the semi-portable section almost all reports fall in the semi-quantitative group and of these more than half of the reports used a variant of nanotechnology often using EC technology such as Palmsens for detection.…”
Section: Sensors/methods Investigated Using Test Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be altered if a smartphone camera is used as a detector which has been the case for both pesticides (Comina et al, 2016) and mycotoxins (Machado et al, 2018). In fact when reviewing the portable axes of the TEST system, colorimetric techniques currently prevail with microorganisms (Liu et al, 2015) (Wu et al, 2015) (Jiang et al, 2016) and mycotoxins (Zhang et al, 2018) (Liu et al, 2017) (Song et al, 2014) being the most mentioned targets. As for the semi-portable section almost all reports fall in the semi-quantitative group and of these more than half of the reports used a variant of nanotechnology often using EC technology such as Palmsens for detection.…”
Section: Sensors/methods Investigated Using Test Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, across all target groups, nanomaterials seem to be a major factor in effecting sensitivity (pink sensors figure 3c). Striking examples were the multiplexed method for the detection of 5 chemical contaminants with LODs of 0.1 to 5 ppb in drinking water by using monoclonal antibodies conjugated to gold nanospheres (Xing et al, 2015), a plasmonic ELISA for aflatoxin-B1 detection, using gold nanorods with IC50 of 22 pg/mL (reported as 32 fold lower than the LOD of conventional ELISA) (Xiong et al, 2018) and a device for pathogen detection which implemented superparamagnetic nanoparticles with a LOD as low as 158 CFU/g in seafood (Liu et al, 2015). However, the targets and matrixes used for these sensors were different.…”
Section: Analytical Techniques and Their Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for using this particles as label are its unique properties, such as magnetism in strong magnetic fields, and this property prevents aggregation and precipitation [208]. A various LFA studies, which use supermagnetic particles as label, have been developed for Bacillus anthracis spores [208,209], paralbumin [210], Vibrio parahaemolyticus [90], cardiac troponin I [211], human chrorionic gonadotroponin (hCG) [212] detection. The developed LFA, which are based on superparamagnetic nanoparticles, are summarized in Table 6.…”
Section: Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles (Mnps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a variety of methods for detecting paramagnetic and superparamagnetic nanoparticles on lateral flow assays based on either the inductive effect or magnetoresistance. For example, MagnaBioSciences (USA) has developed an induction-based device that has been used extensively in the literature for detection of infectious diseases such as anthrax, 366,367 T. solium , 349 HIV, 360,361 V. parahemolyticus , 364 and L. monocytogenes . 365 In this format, the lateral flow assay is placed inside an oscillating magnetic field on a set of induction coils, and the instrument measures the induced electromotive force (V) on the coils.…”
Section: Point-of-care Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%