A guide to write a scientific paper for new writers

Lin, Pao-Yuan; Kuo, Ur-Ren

doi:10.1002/micr.20960

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For information on basic critical appraisal concepts, see references [12,13]. Lastly, the current article can be read in conjunction with several other articles that offer guidance for scientific writing (see references [14][15][16][17][18][19] for some recent examples), as well as articles that propose guidelines for the reporting of different types of trials [20][21][22][23][24]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reporting a Population Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Study: A Journal’s Perspective

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reporting a Population Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Study: A Journal’s Perspective

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Keep in mind that the best titles are short (11). A good title is a few words long (12). The title should not be in the form of question, if possible.…”

Section: Writing Article Titlementioning

confidence: 99%

How to Write and Publish a Scientific Article?

Ölçücü¹,

Aydın²,

Özgök³

2018

jus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The scientific article is the printed report that describes the outcomes of the authentic studies. Scientific progress can be achieved with studies. Sharing the results of studies and experiences by presenting rare cases is only possible through the articles published in scientific journals (1). Studies find their value only by publishing, if they reach conclusions. Thus, Gerard Piel's statement "Without publication, science is dead" explains this very well. Namely, if you do not publish your work, it has no meaning in the world of science (2). Turkish proverbs such as "Wisdom exists with the pen" and phrases like "Words fly away, writings remain" are the answers for "Why should science be published?". One of the common problems encountered by young researchers is the subject of "How to prepare a scientific article?" (3,4). Hence, embalming the dead is easier than writing an article about it for some, as Paul Silvia stated (5). Before starting to write an article, setting up your daily plans and appointments are recommended. One-2 hours daily should be reserved for writing the article. First of all, it is necessary to ask the questions shown in Table 1 for the publication. Once these questions are answered, you can begin writing. References should be studied carefully for fundamentals and literature reviews. Today, the internet is frequently used for reference scanning. It is possible to reach references from many internet sites such as Pubmed, Google Scholar, Research Gate, IEEE Xplore, ISI Web of Knowledge, the Günümüzde bilim yapanlar arasında iletişimin en doğru yollarından biri bilimsel makale yazımıdır. Bilimsel makaleler akademik yönden yükselmek veya diğer bilim adamları tarafından tanınmak için de ele alınabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; yazar adaylarının bilimsel makale hazırlama aşamasında yaptıkları yanlışları göstermek, yazarlara uygun makale hazırlanmasında rota oluşturmak ve bu hazırlık zarfındaki istenmeyen zaman kaybını engellemektir. Bilimsel makale yazılırken birçok hata yapılabilir. Bir bilimsel makale her bölüme daha fazla dikkat edilerek hazırlanmalıdır. Makale için yayımlanmış bazı kurallar olsa da tam olarak ne ifade etmek istediğini makalede yeterince açıklayabilmek için yazarın iyi grameri olmalıdır. Bu çalışmamızın yeni yazarların nispeten daha iyi makaleler hazırlamasına yardımcı olacağını ve sıklıkla yapılan yanlışları belirterek makale hazırlanması esnasındaki zaman kaybını minimize edeceğini düşünmekteyiz.

show abstract

“…Titles are considered important as they provide the first impression of a paper (Lin and Kuo, 2012). That said, there is scant guidance and instruction in publication manuals on how to write effective titles and why they matter (Ebel et al, 2004).…”

Section: A Template For Sr 41 Titlementioning

confidence: 99%

Toward a theory of collaboration for evidence-based management

HakemZadeh

Baba

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to address the research-practice gap in management and advocate the need for an independent organization, called the evidence-based management (EBMgt) collaboration to facilitate generation and dissemination of knowledge that is rigorous, relevant, and actionable. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a theory-building approach to collaboration. They identify existing challenges in the research-practice gap literature and argue that EBMgt offers the most viable alternative to narrow this gap. They offer a theory of collaboration with supporting propositions that engages the generators, disseminators, and users of management knowledge in an ongoing sustainable collaboration toward EBMgt. Findings The authors envision evidence at the center of the EBMgt collaboration. They offer a process model of EBMgt incorporating a collaboration that ensures the fusion of rigor, relevance, and actionability of management knowledge toward the production of strong evidence that is of value to a decision maker. They suggest that the collaboration generate evidence in the form of a systematic review (SR) using a standard template and make it available online to management decision makers around the world in real time. They outline the parameters of the SR and offer details on the design of the Template. Research limitations/implications The theory of collaboration brings together various competing ideas and recommendations made over the past few decades to close the research-practice gap in management. The theory can be used as a guideline to establish and maintain the operation of an EBMgt collaboration. Practical implications The authors offer details on the format and content of a standardized SR along with a template to execute it. They believe it would appeal to a practicing manager to know the state-of-the-art knowledge that applies to a decision that he or she is about to make in real time. Originality/value The work provides a theoretical platform for the idea of EBMgt collaboration that was not available before. The authors add value to the research-practice gap literature by addressing critical concerns including the identification of relevant research questions, evaluating and grading evidence, fostering communication between researchers and practitioners, and translating research to practicing managers. The integration of research and organizational knowledge in the form of an SR that provides decision support to a practicing manager is of significant value to the profession. The conceptualization of the collaboration, not as a research method but as a separate social system that links key management knowledge stakeholders together adds originality to collaboration research.

show abstract

A guide to write a scientific paper for new writers

Cited by 11 publications

References 23 publications

Reporting a Population Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Study: A Journal’s Perspective

Reporting a Population Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Study: A Journal’s Perspective

How to Write and Publish a Scientific Article?

Toward a theory of collaboration for evidence-based management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About