2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A gridless boundary condition method for the solution of the Euler equations on embedded Cartesian meshes with multigrid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, we expect to arrive at a general solution method that is flexible, efficient, and accurate for problems with complex geometries. A similar approach to the present work was reported by Kirshman and Liu,29 who used a finite difference scheme with Van Leer flux-splitting technique. In the present work, a finite volume formulation with central differencing for the Euler equations is used, and an alternative simpler gridless approach is employed in discretizing the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, we expect to arrive at a general solution method that is flexible, efficient, and accurate for problems with complex geometries. A similar approach to the present work was reported by Kirshman and Liu,29 who used a finite difference scheme with Van Leer flux-splitting technique. In the present work, a finite volume formulation with central differencing for the Euler equations is used, and an alternative simpler gridless approach is employed in discretizing the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Use of locally refined embedded mesh as adopted in Ref. 29 would improve both convergence and accuracy of the computations. Nevertheless, this three-element test case demonstrates the flexibility offered by the Cartesian method with the present gridless boundary condition implementation.…”
Section: Three-element Airfoilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advantages of this method include the grid generation being a simple task, the ease of implementing high-order schemes as well as the low memory requirements [1,2]. Furthermore, with the Cartesian grid method, the quality of the mesh can be maintained as no mesh movement or remeshing is required during the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, this will cause difficulties when enforcing the boundary conditions directly on the grid lines (or volume surfaces). This problem has been addressed by many investigators, and great effort has been made to develop effective methods to overcome this deficiency [1,2,[11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If meshless technique is employed then the diffusive flux can be obtained as the product of point fluxes and least square (LSQ) coefficients along coordinate directions prior to time integration to steady state solution. Irregular boundaries and fine broken cells at the wall, which were constraints to computational accuracy of Cartesian mesh solvers, are now implemented efficiently by meshless wall boundary techniques [3]. The accuracy with which shock waves reflecting at the wall boundaries can be captured depends both on the computational schemes used and the shock structure model adopted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%