1985
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3841(85)90032-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A grid theory of stress in polish

Abstract: This paper presents a survey of the Polish stress system and explores the theoretical consequences of' this system for a number of current issues in phonological theory: the notion 'extrametricality'; grids versus trees, and principles of eurhythmicity. It is argued that the metrical grid is superior to the metrical tree for the description of' stress patterns in Polish words and phrases. This analysis of Polish stress has also consequences for the typology of stress systems. Furthermore, the analysis of stres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
88
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
6
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus these two languages would rate as intermediate on a rhythmic scale like the one proposed by Dauer (1987). As a matter of fact, no firm agreement on their rhythmic status had been arrived at by phonologists (Hayes & Puppel, 1985;Mascaró, 1976;Rubach & Booij, 1985;Wheeler, 1979). It should be noticed that while Dauer (1987) proposed that languages may be scattered along a continuum, the fact that some languages fall between typically syllable-timed and stresstimed languages does not exclude the possibility that there are just more classes than those originally proposed.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus these two languages would rate as intermediate on a rhythmic scale like the one proposed by Dauer (1987). As a matter of fact, no firm agreement on their rhythmic status had been arrived at by phonologists (Hayes & Puppel, 1985;Mascaró, 1976;Rubach & Booij, 1985;Wheeler, 1979). It should be noticed that while Dauer (1987) proposed that languages may be scattered along a continuum, the fact that some languages fall between typically syllable-timed and stresstimed languages does not exclude the possibility that there are just more classes than those originally proposed.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pike (1945) thus renamed the two types of rhythms "syllable-timed" and "stress-timed", and Abercrombie (1967) went a step further by claiming that linguistic rhythm was either based on the isochrony of syllables, or on the isochrony of interstress intervals, for all languages throughout the world. Further work generally classified Germanic and Slavonic languages, as well as Arabic, as stress-timed, Romance languages as syllable-timed, and hypothesized a third category of mora-timed languages, including Japanese and Tamil (Abercrombie, 1967;Bertinetto, 1989;Ladefoged, 1975;Pike, 1945;Port, Dalby, & O'Dell, 1987;Rubach & Booij, 1985;Steever, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the space of canonical rhythm types, Polish has been placed between stress- (Rubach and Booij 1985) and syllable-timing (Hayes and Puppel 1985) and, consequently, is often described as 'mixed' (Nespor 1990). Certainly, some phonological characteristics suggested to correlate with distinct rhythm types (Dauer 1983) point to a mixed type for Polish: large consonant clusters and no vowel reduction.…”
Section: Rhythm Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the learner's output does not match the learning datum, the learner compares its output (the loser) to the learning datum (the winner) in order to determine how to adjust the grammar. For example, suppose the learner is presented with the form [tɛ(ˈlɛfɔn)] while learning a language much like Polish, with regular penultimate stress (Rubach and Booij 1985). Suppose the learner must correctly rank constraints preferring right and left alignment of feet, ALLFEETRIGHT and ALLFEETLEFT, respectively, and constraints preferring right and left headed feet, IAMBIC and TROCHAIC, respectively.…”
Section: Error Driven Learning and Hidden Structurementioning
confidence: 99%