1995
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890060021004
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

A Graduated Method of Tip Graft Fixation in Rhinoplasty

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
8
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
1
0
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 9 publications

(1 citation statement)
references

References 3 publications

0
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Between 1993 and 2000, which is after the more widespread acceptance of the open rhinoplasty technique but before our data, the revision rate was 9.9%. 6,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27] However, in a recent large database review of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty between 2005 and 2009, the overall revision rate was low at 3.3%. When separated into type of surgery, the primary rhinoplasty revision rate was also very low at 3.1%, whereas the secondary rhinoplasty revision rate was higher at 11.0%.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Between 1993 and 2000, which is after the more widespread acceptance of the open rhinoplasty technique but before our data, the revision rate was 9.9%. 6,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27] However, in a recent large database review of patients undergoing septorhinoplasty between 2005 and 2009, the overall revision rate was low at 3.3%. When separated into type of surgery, the primary rhinoplasty revision rate was also very low at 3.1%, whereas the secondary rhinoplasty revision rate was higher at 11.0%.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%