2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-018-0294-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetically encoded near-infrared fluorescent calcium ion indicator

Abstract: We report an intensiometric, near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent, genetically encoded calcium ion (Ca 2+ ) indicator (GECI) with excitation and emission maxima at 678 nm and 704 nm, respectively. This GECI, designated NIR-GECO1, enables imaging of Ca 2+ transients in cultured mammalian cells and brain tissue with sensitivity comparable to currently available visible-wavelength GECIs. We demonstrate that NIR-GECO1 opens up new vistas for multicolor Ca 2+ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
177
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
177
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Briefly, purified proteins were loaded into 384-well plates and then supplied with either 10 mM EGTA or 5 mM CaCl2 before measuring emission spectra. The extinction coefficients (EC), quantum yield (QY) and pKa for NIR-GECO variants were determined as previously described 8 . Ca 2+ titrations of NIR-GECO variants were performed with EGTA-buffered Ca 2+ solutions.…”
Section: Protein Purification and In Vitro Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, purified proteins were loaded into 384-well plates and then supplied with either 10 mM EGTA or 5 mM CaCl2 before measuring emission spectra. The extinction coefficients (EC), quantum yield (QY) and pKa for NIR-GECO variants were determined as previously described 8 . Ca 2+ titrations of NIR-GECO variants were performed with EGTA-buffered Ca 2+ solutions.…”
Section: Protein Purification and In Vitro Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, genetically encoded sensors are usually preferred due to their ability to precisely target cells of interest. A wide range of biomolecular sensors currently exists for detecting neural activity− calcium [2][3][4], voltage [3,5], potassium [6,7] and neurotransmitters [3]. While fluorescent reporters have been the mainstay, it suffers from tissue scattering, phototoxicity, photobleaching and autofluorescence affecting its long-term use [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While fluorescent reporters have been the mainstay, it suffers from tissue scattering, phototoxicity, photobleaching and autofluorescence affecting its long-term use [8]. Near-infrared indicators [4,9,10] and two-photon excitation [11,12] overcome some of these limitations, but the development of efficient indicators of neural activity remains an issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this approach has led to robust sensors excitable with shorter wavelengths (<550 nm), analogous sensors based on redshifted fluorescent proteins have proven much more difficult to optimize. 6,7 Here, we demonstrate a new hybrid 8,9 small-molecule:protein ('chemigenetic') sensor scaffold based on the self-labeling HaloTag protein 10,11 and fluorogenic rhodamine dyes [12][13][14][15] . These chemigenetic sensors combine the genetic targetability and exquisite molecular recognition of proteins with the improved photophysical properties of synthetic fluorophores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%