2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.12.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic map of large yellow croaker Pseudosciaena crocea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the current map provides only 47.6% coverage of the rohu genome in contrast to 99% coverage reported by Robinson et al (2014). Further, the genome coverage in the present study is less when compared with other teleost linkage maps like channel catfish (Liu et al 2003), rainbow trout (Guyomard et al 2006), turbot (Bouza et al 2007), silver carp and bighead carp , yellow croacker (Ning et al 2007), Atlantic salmon (Moen et al 2008) and Atlantic cord (Hubert et al 2010).…”
Section: Linkage Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the current map provides only 47.6% coverage of the rohu genome in contrast to 99% coverage reported by Robinson et al (2014). Further, the genome coverage in the present study is less when compared with other teleost linkage maps like channel catfish (Liu et al 2003), rainbow trout (Guyomard et al 2006), turbot (Bouza et al 2007), silver carp and bighead carp , yellow croacker (Ning et al 2007), Atlantic salmon (Moen et al 2008) and Atlantic cord (Hubert et al 2010).…”
Section: Linkage Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…This study shows that the microsatellites are effective markers for linkage mapping in L. rohita, as it has been shown for other fish and shellfish species (Sekino and Hara 2007;Shen et al 2007;Nomura et al 2011;Liu et al 2012). The proportion of informative loci observed in the present study was 20.7% which is lower than other aquatic species (Zhu et al 2006;Ning et al 2007). This is probably due to the fact that without prior polymorphism assessment, all the SSRs were randomly screened as markers in the reference family.…”
Section: Linkage Analysissupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Additionally, "Pujiang No.1" blunt snout bream (Pujiang No.1 Megalobrama amblycephala) [9], new Gift tilapia (GIFT, Oreochromis niloticus) [10] and Matsuura mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio Songpu carp) [7] were also obtained by selective methods. Among marine fish, bastard halibut (Paralichthys olivaceus) [11], large yellow croaker (Pseudosciaen acrocea) [12], etc. [13] were bred using selection methods and the BLUP breeding method was used for the selection of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) [14].…”
Section: Traditional Selective Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA templates for AFLP reactions were generated by restriction digestion and ligation. Ligation of Eco RI and Mse I adaptors and pre‐amplification and selective amplification were carried out according to Wang et al (2004) and Ning et al (2007). The selective amplification was performed using four pairs of primers: E‐AAC/M‐CTC, E‐ACG/M‐CAC, E‐ACT/M‐CGT and E‐ATA/M‐CGG.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%