1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6750(199903)46:2<199::aid-nav5>3.0.co;2-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genetic algorithm methodology for complex scheduling problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One notable exception is the work done by Norman and Bean (1999) in the application of a random keys genetic algorithm to a complex production problem, which is in many respects similar to the problem faced by Optimatix. Multiple machines, ready times, sequence-dependent set-up times, machine down time and scarce tools are addressed.…”
Section: The Problem Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One notable exception is the work done by Norman and Bean (1999) in the application of a random keys genetic algorithm to a complex production problem, which is in many respects similar to the problem faced by Optimatix. Multiple machines, ready times, sequence-dependent set-up times, machine down time and scarce tools are addressed.…”
Section: The Problem Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P-PSO is, therefore, benchmarked against four other algorithms of which the first two algorithms are existing Optimatix algorithms currently in use. For the third algorithm Norman and Bean's (1999) RKGA was identified as the most promising algorithm identified from existing literature. Finally, the use of alternative metaheuristics within the priority-based algorithm framework was investigated through the implementation of a priority-based differential evolution (DE) algorithm .…”
Section: Comparison Of the P-pso Algorithm Against Alternative Solutimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations