1944
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1944.01510090018002
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

A Generalized Mercurial (Cinnabar) Reaction Following Tattooing

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
15
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
2
0
0

Year Published

1946
1946
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
12
4

Relationship

0
16

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 16 publications

(2 citation statements)
references

References 1 publication

0
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Studies by Madden (1939) showed that such reactions could produce allergic granulomas, and Rostenberg et al (1950) showed causation by sensitivity to various metallic or dye pigments. Tbe capacity of such materials to give rise to systemic specific sensitivities was documented by Novy (1944), Sulzberger et al (1944), Swinney (1946), and Biro & Klein (1967). Rook & Thomas (1952) and Beerman & Lane (1954) summarized the data on inflammation in tattoos and clearly indicated that delayed hypersensitivity was one of a series of specific dermatological reactions that could involve a tattoo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Studies by Madden (1939) showed that such reactions could produce allergic granulomas, and Rostenberg et al (1950) showed causation by sensitivity to various metallic or dye pigments. Tbe capacity of such materials to give rise to systemic specific sensitivities was documented by Novy (1944), Sulzberger et al (1944), Swinney (1946), and Biro & Klein (1967). Rook & Thomas (1952) and Beerman & Lane (1954) summarized the data on inflammation in tattoos and clearly indicated that delayed hypersensitivity was one of a series of specific dermatological reactions that could involve a tattoo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…New bright-colored inks are being introduced at an unknown rate, and are often those most difficult to remove by laser treatment. Although most tattoos appear to be well tolerated, there are reports of infection, photosensitivity, acute, and chronic hypersensitivity reactions [19][20][21][22]. Tattoo ink is permanently taken up in lymph nodes in addition to the intended target organ, skin.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 99%