A Generalized Mechanism for Ligand‐Induced Dipolar Assembly of Plasmonic Gold Nanoparticle Chain Networks

Abstract

The mechanism of gold nanoparticle chain assembly associated with the induction of electric dipole–dipole interactions arising from the partial ligand exchange of surface‐adsorbed citrate ions by mercaptoethanol is investigated. UV‐vis spectrophotometry and electron microscopy are used, respectively, to determine the kinetics and time‐dependent structural changes associated with formation of the 1D nanoparticle superstructures between 5 and 50 °C. The results indicate that assembly of the plasmonic nanoparticle networks is extremely sensitive to changes in temperature. Formation of the nanoparticle chains is optimized at 25–30 °C and follows first order kinetics with increasing reaction rates attained for higher initial nanoparticle concentrations. Below 25 °C, plasmonic nanoparticle networks are produced but at a considerably reduced rate. In contrast, above 30 °C, short‐chain networks form rapidly but the process is superseded by a secondary mechanism that limits chain growth and produces small fragments and isolated Au nanoparticles. The changes in assembly behavior are attributed to the temperature‐dependent ordering and disordering of mercaptoethanol molecules associated with the gold nanoparticle surface. The results provide a general mechanistic model for the self‐assembly of metallic nanoparticles based on ligand‐induced electric dipolar interactions, which are globally under thermodynamic control but sensitive to kinetic aspects. It is also shown that the dipolar mechanism can be further exploited to introduce larger nanoparticles as topological dopants that reside specifically at branching points or termini in the self‐assembled 1D nanoparticle networks.

Gold Nanoparticles Aggregation: Drastic Effect of Cooperative Functionalities in a Single Molecular Conjugate

“…However, both experimental absorption peaks for an aggregated colloid are red-shifted with respect to the peak for an unaggregated colloid, while simulated absorption peaks behave differently: for a spherical aggregate, it is red-shifted, but for all of linear aggregates, one of the peaks is blue-shifted, and the other is red-shifted. This implies that the optical response of an aggregated Au colloid should be due to close to spherical and chain-like aggregates present in solution, which is consistent with published data. ,,− …”

In Situ Formation of One‐Dimensional Assemblies of Gold Nanoparticles in Confined Media

“…However, we think their contribution is of minor importance, provided that ellipsoidal NPs, such as low‐aspect ratio Au nanorods are known to display two clear absorption peaks corresponding to their transversal and longitudinal plasmon bands36, 37, whereas in the present case only a small shoulder is observed around 540 nm. The shape of the plasmon band and its location around 600 nm is in agreement with those reported for 2D superlattices made from DNA‐capped gold NPs assemblies,38 1D assemblies of Au NPs using protein fibrils or Au nanowires as templating agents,17, 32, 39 1D Au NP chains,40–42, or monolayer arrays of spherical NPs in films 43…”

Self‐Assembled Platinum Nanochain Networks Driven by Induced Magnetic Dipoles

“…Figure c shows the high‐resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of several assembled nanoparticles extracted from a typical Pt chain, from which a lattice spacing of 2.30 Å can be observed, corresponding to the (111) facet of face‐centered cubic (fcc) Pt. It should be noticed that interparticle gap (≈0.7 nm) between adjacent Pt nanoparticles can be clearly seen (marked by red arrows), which is quite different from previously reported Au chains governed by electric dipoles, for which the adjacent nanoparticles were often in close contact within the chains. Although the presence of PVP can be detected by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum discussed below, the polymer coating is almost invisible in Figure c, indicating that PVP molecules form a very thin layer on the surface of the Pt nanoparticles.…”