2010
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2010.2049921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Procedure for Introducing Structured Nonorthogonal Discretization Grids Into High-Order Finite-Difference Time-Domain Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, FDTD has become one of the most popular methods in computational electromagnetics (CEM), but it still has much potential towards higher accuracy, faster speed, broader applications, and larger computational capacity. For instance, a lot of research results on FDTD have been presented to improve its second-order accuracy and reduce the error from geometric staircase approximation (such as the high-order FDTD [3] and conformal FDTD [4]- [7]). Meanwhile, parallel programming technologies (OpenMP, MPI, and GPU [8], [9]) have been greatly applied in FDTD simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, FDTD has become one of the most popular methods in computational electromagnetics (CEM), but it still has much potential towards higher accuracy, faster speed, broader applications, and larger computational capacity. For instance, a lot of research results on FDTD have been presented to improve its second-order accuracy and reduce the error from geometric staircase approximation (such as the high-order FDTD [3] and conformal FDTD [4]- [7]). Meanwhile, parallel programming technologies (OpenMP, MPI, and GPU [8], [9]) have been greatly applied in FDTD simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amid the broad assortment of numerical tools, the contribution of the finite‐difference time‐domain (FDTD) algorithm to the investigation of waveguide and antenna devices has been widely acknowledged, furnishing beneficial outcomes, along with its various powerful high‐order renditions . Nevertheless, its applicability to contemporary scenarios is proven cumbersome, especially on a wideband basis, as most of the devices have many geometric details, arbitrary discontinuities, or involve dispersive materials, which call for prolonged simulations because of the Courant stability condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, an extensive decrease of dispersion errors is achieved, even when time-steps are chosen appreciably beyond stability limits. These advanced simulation competences are successfully applied to diverse real-world setups and composite configurations, thus validating the efficiency and universality of the proposed methodology.Amid the broad assortment of numerical tools, the contribution of the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) algorithm [8] to the investigation of waveguide and antenna devices has been widely acknowledged, furnishing beneficial outcomes, along with its various powerful high-order renditions [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Nevertheless, its applicability to contemporary scenarios is proven cumbersome, especially on a wideband basis, as most of the devices have many geometric details, arbitrary discontinuities, or involve dispersive materials, which call for prolonged simulations because of the Courant stability condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%