2007
DOI: 10.1097/chi.0b013e3180335b12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Population Twin Study of the CBCL/6-18 DSM-Oriented Scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
56
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, we have examined the aetiological influences on the CBCL DOS as defined by Achenbach and Rescorla [2] in twins belonging to the Italian Registry by quantitative ML approach; our results show that the phenotypic variance of the new DOS scales is explained by only additive genetic and unique environmental agents. Moreover, heritability estimates were in general higher for the DOS than for the 'classical' CBCL scales [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, we have examined the aetiological influences on the CBCL DOS as defined by Achenbach and Rescorla [2] in twins belonging to the Italian Registry by quantitative ML approach; our results show that the phenotypic variance of the new DOS scales is explained by only additive genetic and unique environmental agents. Moreover, heritability estimates were in general higher for the DOS than for the 'classical' CBCL scales [49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is based on the responses provided to the CBCL 6/18 by parents of children belonging in the Italian Twin Registry (ITR), a database including all possible twins in the Italian population [50], from which subjects aged 8-17 years, living in the industrialized province of Milan and in the suburban province of Lecco were sampled for psychometric studies of different nature and aims [35,36,49]. The recruitment methods and the socio-demographic characteristics are reported in detail elsewhere [36,49].…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent twin multivariate genetic epidemiological analyses in the Italian general population showed that compared with the classic CBCL/6-18 empirical subscales, the DOSs have higher heritability (lowest 0.56 and 0.61 for attention deficit/hyperactivity problems and oppositional defiant problems; highest 0.71 for conduct problems), and simpler causal structure, in that the phenotypic variance is satisfactorily explained by additive genetic and unique environmental factors only [48]. Moreover, the covariation of DOS scales can best be attributed to one common genetic factor and to two idiosyncratic environmental factors, each loading differently on the internalizing (anxiety and affective problems) and the externalizing (attention-deficit/hyperactivity, oppositional defiant, and conduct problems).…”
Section: Behavioural Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the classic CBCL 6/18 empirical subscales, the newly established CBCL 6/18 DSM-Oriented Scales (DOS) system have higher heritability and simpler causal structure, in that the phenotypic variance can be satisfactorily explained by additive genetic and unique environmental factors only [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%